From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:35:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:35:24 -0400 Received: from roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com ([24.169.102.121]:55047 "EHLO roc-24-169-102-121.rochester.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 9 Aug 2001 14:35:20 -0400 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 14:35:21 -0400 From: Chris Mason To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org cc: torvalds@transmeta.com, viro@math.psu.edu, mge@sistina.com Subject: [PATCH] LVM snapshot support for reiserfs and others Message-ID: <190670000.997382121@tiny> X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.8 (Linux/x86) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello everyone, This patch has been floating around for a while and is heavily used; Heinz and I coded it last October or so. Minor change in the port to 2.4.8-pre was moving the sync_supers call in fsync_dev_lockfs to match the changes in fsync_dev. It adds calls to make use of the write_super_lockfs and unlockfs callbacks, which allows the filesystem to do a full sync and block new writers while LVM creates a snapshot. This way, the snapshot is actually consistent on creation. There's one reiserfs hunk in there (also very old) to fix a bug in my initial reiserfs_write_super_lockfs call. Patch against 2.4.8-pre6, it won't apply on top of -ac due to Al's changes. I'm merging a bunch of stuff into -ac again, I'll merge this as well. Linus, please apply -chris diff -Nru a/drivers/md/lvm.c b/drivers/md/lvm.c --- a/drivers/md/lvm.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/drivers/md/lvm.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ #define DEVICE_OFF(device) /* lvm_do_lv_create calls fsync_dev_lockfs()/unlockfs() */ -/* #define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT */ +#define LVM_VFS_ENHANCEMENT #include #include diff -Nru a/fs/buffer.c b/fs/buffer.c --- a/fs/buffer.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/fs/buffer.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -367,6 +367,33 @@ fsync_dev(dev); } +int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t dev) +{ + sync_buffers(dev, 0); + + lock_kernel(); + /* note, the FS might need to start transactions to + ** sync the inodes, or the quota, no locking until + ** after these are done + */ + sync_inodes(dev); + DQUOT_SYNC(dev); + /* if inodes or quotas could be dirtied during the + ** sync_supers_lockfs call, the FS is responsible for getting + ** them on disk, without deadlocking against the lock + ** + ** we call sync_supers first so that + ** fsync_dev_lockfs == fsync_dev for filesystems that don't provide + ** a lockfs call. Yes, it could be done in sync_supers_lockfs + ** instead, but this just makes it more explicit... + */ + sync_supers(dev) ; + sync_supers_lockfs(dev) ; + unlock_kernel(); + + return sync_buffers(dev, 1) ; +} + asmlinkage long sys_sync(void) { fsync_dev(0); diff -Nru a/fs/reiserfs/super.c b/fs/reiserfs/super.c --- a/fs/reiserfs/super.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/fs/reiserfs/super.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ reiserfs_prepare_for_journal(s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB(s), 1); journal_mark_dirty(&th, s, SB_BUFFER_WITH_SB (s)); reiserfs_block_writes(&th) ; - journal_end(&th, s, 1) ; + journal_end_sync(&th, s, 1) ; } s->s_dirt = dirty; unlock_kernel() ; diff -Nru a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c --- a/fs/super.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/fs/super.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -672,6 +672,46 @@ } } +/* + * Note: don't check the dirty flag before waiting, we want the lock + * to happen every time this is called. + */ +void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t dev) +{ + struct super_block * sb; + + for (sb = sb_entry(super_blocks.next); + sb != sb_entry(&super_blocks); + sb = sb_entry(sb->s_list.next)) { + if (!sb->s_dev) + continue; + if (dev && sb->s_dev != dev) + continue; + lock_super(sb); + if (sb->s_dev && (!dev || dev == sb->s_dev)) + if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs) + sb->s_op->write_super_lockfs(sb); + unlock_super(sb); + } +} + +void unlockfs(kdev_t dev) +{ + struct super_block * sb; + + for (sb = sb_entry(super_blocks.next); + sb != sb_entry(&super_blocks); + sb = sb_entry(sb->s_list.next)) { + if (!sb->s_dev) + continue; + if (dev && sb->s_dev != dev) + continue; + if (sb->s_dev && (!dev || dev == sb->s_dev)) + if (sb->s_op && sb->s_op->unlockfs) + sb->s_op->unlockfs(sb); + } +} + /** * get_super - get the superblock of a device * @dev: device to get the superblock for diff -Nru a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h --- a/include/linux/fs.h Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/include/linux/fs.h Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -1160,6 +1160,7 @@ extern void write_inode_now(struct inode *, int); extern void sync_dev(kdev_t); extern int fsync_dev(kdev_t); +extern int fsync_dev_lockfs(kdev_t); extern int fsync_super(struct super_block *); extern void sync_inodes_sb(struct super_block *); extern int fsync_inode_buffers(struct inode *); @@ -1168,6 +1169,8 @@ extern void filemap_fdatasync(struct address_space *); extern void filemap_fdatawait(struct address_space *); extern void sync_supers(kdev_t); +extern void sync_supers_lockfs(kdev_t); +extern void unlockfs(kdev_t); extern int bmap(struct inode *, int); extern int notify_change(struct dentry *, struct iattr *); extern int permission(struct inode *, int); diff -Nru a/kernel/ksyms.c b/kernel/ksyms.c --- a/kernel/ksyms.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 +++ b/kernel/ksyms.c Thu Aug 9 14:28:30 2001 @@ -176,6 +176,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(invalidate_inode_pages); EXPORT_SYMBOL(truncate_inode_pages); EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(fsync_dev_lockfs); +EXPORT_SYMBOL(unlockfs); EXPORT_SYMBOL(permission); EXPORT_SYMBOL(vfs_permission); EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_setattr);