linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: cruzzhao <cruzzhao@linux.alibaba.com>
To: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de,
	bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/core: Optimize the process of picking the max prio task for the core
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2022 15:29:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1925ed3c-947a-512d-2d02-4827327e671a@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1664435913-57227-1-git-send-email-CruzZhao@linux.alibaba.com>



在 2022/9/29 下午3:18, Cruz Zhao 写道:
> When we pick the max prio task for the core in the case of
> sched_core_enabled(), if there's a task with a higher prio sched
> class in the runqueue of a SMT, it's not necessary for other SMTs
> to traverse lower prio sched classes. So we can change the traversal
> order: for each sched class, if there exists a max prio task among
> the core, pick it and break the loop.
> 
> To compare the prio of the tasks with the same sched class, we
> introduce sched_class::prio_less().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Cruz Zhao <CruzZhao@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/core.c      | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  kernel/sched/deadline.c  | 11 +++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/fair.c      |  5 ++++-
>  kernel/sched/idle.c      | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/rt.c        | 10 ++++++++++
>  kernel/sched/sched.h     |  5 +++--
>  kernel/sched/stop_task.c | 10 ++++++++++
>  7 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index a2d8a1f..50e28c8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ static inline bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool
>  		return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
>  
>  	if (pa == MAX_RT_PRIO + MAX_NICE)	/* fair */
> -		return cfs_prio_less(a, b, in_fi);
> +		return fair_sched_class.prio_less(a, b, in_fi);
>  
>  	return false;
>  }
> @@ -5886,6 +5886,7 @@ static inline struct task_struct *pick_task(struct rq *rq)
>  	int i, cpu, occ = 0;
>  	struct rq *rq_i;
>  	bool need_sync;
> +	struct sched_class *class;
>  
>  	if (!sched_core_enabled(rq))
>  		return __pick_next_task(rq, prev, rf);
> @@ -5978,12 +5979,6 @@ static inline struct task_struct *pick_task(struct rq *rq)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	/*
> -	 * For each thread: do the regular task pick and find the max prio task
> -	 * amongst them.
> -	 *
> -	 * Tie-break prio towards the current CPU
> -	 */
>  	for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
>  		rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
>  
> @@ -5994,12 +5989,28 @@ static inline struct task_struct *pick_task(struct rq *rq)
>  		 */
>  		if (i != cpu && (rq_i != rq->core || !core_clock_updated))
>  			update_rq_clock(rq_i);
> +	}
>  
> -		p = rq_i->core_pick = pick_task(rq_i);
> -		if (!max || prio_less(max, p, fi_before))
> -			max = p;
> +	/*
> +	 * For each thread: do the regular task pick and find the max prio task
> +	 * amongst them.
> +	 *
> +	 * Tie-break prio towards the current CPU
> +	 */
> +	for_each_class(class) {
> +		for_each_cpu_wrap(i, smt_mask, cpu) {
> +			rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
> +			p = rq_i->core_pick = class->pick_task(rq_i);
> +			if (!max || (p && class->prio_less(max, p, fi_before)))
> +				max = p;
> +		}
> +		if (max)
> +			break;
>  	}
>  
> +	if (!max)
> +		BUG();
> +
>  	cookie = rq->core->core_cookie = max->core_cookie;
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -6010,7 +6021,7 @@ static inline struct task_struct *pick_task(struct rq *rq)
>  		rq_i = cpu_rq(i);
>  		p = rq_i->core_pick;
>  
> -		if (!cookie_equals(p, cookie)) {
> +		if (!p || !cookie_equals(p, cookie)) {
>  			p = NULL;
>  			if (cookie)
>  				p = sched_core_find(rq_i, cookie);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 86dea6a..8e7aa7d 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -1942,6 +1942,7 @@ static int balance_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flags *rf)
>  
>  	return sched_stop_runnable(rq) || sched_dl_runnable(rq);
>  }
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
>  
>  /*
> @@ -2054,6 +2055,13 @@ static void put_prev_task_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  		enqueue_pushable_dl_task(rq, p);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +static bool prio_less_dl(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
> +{
> +	return !dl_time_before(a->dl.deadline, b->dl.deadline);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * scheduler tick hitting a task of our scheduling class.
>   *
> @@ -2704,6 +2712,9 @@ static void prio_changed_dl(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
>  	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_dl,
>  	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_dl,
>  	.set_next_task		= set_next_task_dl,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	.prio_less		= prio_less_dl,
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	.balance		= balance_dl,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e4a0b8b..eca2636 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -11516,7 +11516,7 @@ void task_vruntime_update(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool in_fi)
>  	se_fi_update(se, rq->core->core_forceidle_seq, in_fi);
>  }
>  
> -bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
> +static bool prio_less_fair(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
>  {
>  	struct rq *rq = task_rq(a);
>  	struct sched_entity *sea = &a->se;
> @@ -12159,6 +12159,9 @@ static unsigned int get_rr_interval_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task
>  	.pick_next_task		= __pick_next_task_fair,
>  	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_fair,
>  	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_fair,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	.prio_less		= prio_less_fair,
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	.balance		= balance_fair,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/idle.c b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> index f26ab26..a3c3e37 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/idle.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/idle.c
> @@ -436,6 +436,13 @@ static void set_next_task_idle(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *next, bool fir
>  	schedstat_inc(rq->sched_goidle);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +static bool prio_less_idle(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  static struct task_struct *pick_task_idle(struct rq *rq)
>  {
> @@ -507,6 +514,9 @@ static void update_curr_idle(struct rq *rq)
>  	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_idle,
>  	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_idle,
>  	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_idle,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	.prio_less		= prio_less_idle,
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	.balance		= balance_idle,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> index d869bcf..4459a90 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/rt.c
> @@ -1838,6 +1838,13 @@ static void put_prev_task_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  		enqueue_pushable_task(rq, p);
>  }
>  
> +static bool prio_less_rt(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
> +{
> +	int pa = rt_prio(a->prio), pb = rt_prio(b->prio);
> +
> +	return -pa < -pb;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  
>  /* Only try algorithms three times */
> @@ -2685,6 +2692,9 @@ static unsigned int get_rr_interval_rt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *task)
>  	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_rt,
>  	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_rt,
>  	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_rt,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	.prio_less		= prio_less_rt,
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	.balance		= balance_rt,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> index 1644242..6d8055c 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
> +++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
> @@ -1218,8 +1218,6 @@ static inline raw_spinlock_t *__rq_lockp(struct rq *rq)
>  	return &rq->__lock;
>  }
>  
> -bool cfs_prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool fi);
> -
>  /*
>   * Helpers to check if the CPU's core cookie matches with the task's cookie
>   * when core scheduling is enabled.
> @@ -2155,6 +2153,9 @@ struct sched_class {
>  
>  	void (*put_prev_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p);
>  	void (*set_next_task)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, bool first);
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	bool prio_less(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi);

It should be:
+	bool (*prio_less)(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool
in_fi);

> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	int (*balance)(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev, struct rq_flags *rf);
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> index 8559059..c9ddaaa 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/stop_task.c
> @@ -84,6 +84,13 @@ static void put_prev_task_stop(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev)
>  	update_current_exec_runtime(curr, now, delta_exec);
>  }
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +static bool prio_less_stop(struct task_struct *a, struct task_struct *b, bool in_fi)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /*
>   * scheduler tick hitting a task of our scheduling class.
>   *
> @@ -125,6 +132,9 @@ static void update_curr_stop(struct rq *rq)
>  	.pick_next_task		= pick_next_task_stop,
>  	.put_prev_task		= put_prev_task_stop,
>  	.set_next_task          = set_next_task_stop,
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_CORE
> +	.prio_less		= prio_less_stop,
> +#endif
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>  	.balance		= balance_stop,

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-10-02  7:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-29  7:18 [PATCH] sched/core: Optimize the process of picking the max prio task for the core Cruz Zhao
2022-09-30 16:24 ` kernel test robot
2022-10-02  7:29 ` cruzzhao [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1925ed3c-947a-512d-2d02-4827327e671a@linux.alibaba.com \
    --to=cruzzhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).