From: "André Almeida" <email@example.com> To: Greg KH <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Peter Zijlstra <email@example.com> Cc: Nicholas Piggin <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Andrey Semashev <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Davidlohr Bueso <email@example.com>, Darren Hart <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, Ingo Molnar <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com, Peter Oskolkov <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Steven Rostedt <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Thomas Gleixner <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Add futex2 syscalls Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 11:14:41 -0300 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <YL9Q2tKLZP6GKbHW@kroah.com> Hi Greg, Às 08:13 de 08/06/21, Greg KH escreveu: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 02:03:50PM +0300, Andrey Semashev wrote: >> On 6/8/21 4:25 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote: >>> >>> Are shared pthread mutexes using existing pthread APIs that are today >>> implemented okay with futex1 system call a good reason to constrain >>> futex2 I wonder? Or do we have an opportunity to make a bigger change >>> to the API so it suffers less from non deterministic latency (for >>> example)? >> >> If futex2 is not able to cover futex1 use cases then it cannot be viewed as >> a replacement. In the long term this means futex1 cannot be deprecated and >> has to be maintained. My impression was that futex1 was basically >> unmaintainable(*) and futex2 was an evolution of futex1 so that users of >> futex1 could migrate relatively easily and futex1 eventually removed. Maybe >> my impression was wrong, but I would like to see futex2 as a replacement and >> extension of futex1, so the latter can be deprecated at some point. > > You can never delete a kernel system call, so even if you "deprecate" > it, it still needs to be supported for forever. > > Best of all would be if internally your "futex2" code would replace the > "futex1" code so that there is no two different code bases. That would > be the only sane way forward, having 2 code bases to work with is just > insane. > >> (*) I use "unmaintainable" in a broad sense here. It exists and works in >> newer kernel versions and may receive code changes that are necessary to >> keep it working, but maintainers refuse any extensions or modifications of >> the code, mostly because of its complexity. > > Adding additional complexity for no good reason is not a good idea, > especially if you are asking others to maintain and support that > complexity. Would you want to have to do that work? > > So what's keeping the futex2 code from doing all that futex1 does so > that the futex1 code can be deleted internally? > My very first submission of futex2 was just an overlay on top of futex.c, I didn't get much feedback at that time, but I think this is what you and Peter are thinking of? After that, last year at Plumbers' RT MC, I presented a talk called "futex2: A New Interface" and my conclusion after the discussion on this talk + responses I got from my FUTEX_WAIT_MULTIPLE patchset was that this work couldn't be done at futex.c, given how fragile things are there. futex.c would be "feature freeze" and no new major changes would happen there. This is the context where this new futex2 code base comes from. So, which one is it? Happy to go either way but I'm getting conflicting messages here. Thanks, André  https://firstname.lastname@example.org/  https://email@example.com/ > thanks, > > greg k-h >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-08 14:14 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-06-03 19:59 André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 01/15] futex2: Implement wait and wake functions André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 02/15] futex2: Add support for shared futexes André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 03/15] futex2: Implement vectorized wait André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 04/15] futex2: Implement requeue operation André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 05/15] futex2: Implement support for different futex sizes André Almeida 2021-06-04 0:23 ` kernel test robot 2021-06-06 19:12 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2021-06-06 23:01 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/15] futex2: Add compatibility entry point for x86_x32 ABI André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/15] docs: locking: futex2: Add documentation André Almeida 2021-06-06 19:23 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/15] selftests: futex2: Add wake/wait test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/15] selftests: futex2: Add timeout test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/15] selftests: futex2: Add wouldblock test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/15] selftests: futex2: Add waitv test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 12/15] selftests: futex2: Add requeue test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 13/15] selftests: futex2: Add futex sizes test André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 14/15] perf bench: Add futex2 benchmark tests André Almeida 2021-06-03 19:59 ` [PATCH v4 15/15] kernel: Enable waitpid() for futex2 André Almeida 2021-06-04 4:51 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] Add futex2 syscalls Zebediah Figura 2021-06-04 17:04 ` André Almeida 2021-06-04 11:36 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-04 20:01 ` André Almeida 2021-06-05 1:09 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-05 8:56 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-06 11:57 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-06 13:15 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-08 1:25 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-08 11:03 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-08 11:13 ` Greg KH 2021-06-08 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-06-08 14:31 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2021-06-08 12:06 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-08 12:33 ` Greg KH 2021-06-08 12:35 ` Greg KH 2021-06-08 13:18 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-08 13:27 ` Greg KH 2021-06-08 13:41 ` Andrey Semashev 2021-06-08 17:06 ` Zebediah Figura 2021-06-08 14:14 ` André Almeida [this message] 2021-06-07 15:40 ` André Almeida 2021-06-08 1:31 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-08 2:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso 2021-06-08 4:45 ` Nicholas Piggin 2021-06-08 12:26 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-06-08 14:23 ` Peter Zijlstra 2021-06-08 14:57 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior 2021-06-08 15:04 ` André Almeida 2021-06-08 18:08 ` Adhemerval Zanella 2021-06-08 18:19 ` Florian Weimer 2021-06-08 18:22 ` Adhemerval Zanella 2021-06-09 16:26 ` David Laight
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] Add futex2 syscalls' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).