From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A8EC43218 for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF89E2067C for ; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727924AbfDYNhy (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:37:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40304 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725935AbfDYNhy (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:37:54 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12BDD307EA92; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E34D01001DC0; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail19.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.22]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 901561803397; Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 09:37:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Veronika Kabatova To: Dhaval Giani Cc: Sasha Levin , shuah , Kevin Hilman , Tim Bird , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Dan Carpenter , willy@infradead.org, gustavo padovan , Dmitry Vyukov , knut omang , Eliska Slobodova Message-ID: <199564879.15267174.1556199472004.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.40.204.120, 10.4.195.30] Thread-Topic: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC Thread-Index: e9S1whfym86EDjnWz41Li3N4uBypIw== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.44]); Thu, 25 Apr 2019 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Dhaval Giani" > To: "Sasha Levin" , "shuah" , "Kevin Hilman" , > "Tim Bird" , "LKML" > Cc: "Steven Rostedt" , "Dan Carpenter" , willy@infradead.org, "gustavo > padovan" , "Dmitry Vyukov" , "knut omang" > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2019 7:37:51 PM > Subject: Linux Testing Microconference at LPC > > Hi Folks, > > This is a call for participation for the Linux Testing microconference > at LPC this year. > > For those who were at LPC last year, as the closing panel mentioned, > testing is probably the next big push needed to improve quality. From > getting more selftests in, to regression testing to ensure we don't > break realtime as more of PREEMPT_RT comes in, to more stable distros, > we need more testing around the kernel. > > We have talked about different efforts around testing, such as fuzzing > (using syzkaller and trinity), automating fuzzing with syzbot, 0day > testing, test frameworks such as ktests, smatch to find bugs in the > past. We want to push this discussion further this year and are > interested in hearing from you what you want to talk about, and where > kernel testing needs to go next. > > Please let us know what topics you believe should be a part of the > micro conference this year. > Hi, as CKI team, we would like to join the Plumbers discussions about CI for kernel. We obviously have our own working pipeline but would like to get more involved with the other upstream projects working on the same and collaborate on common solutions. I already started some of these discussions on automated-testing mailing list and got in contact with Kevin about the possibility of joining forces with KernelCI project. Our team planned to organize a 'hackfest' for upstream CI during the conference but I heard that the Automated Testing Summit should likely take place during that time too. If that's the case, we should meet up and discuss everything there instead of organizing a separate event. Information and links about CKI Project can be be found at [1] in case people are curious. Some of the things we'd like to achieve is having a single source for all upstream kernel test results where anyone doing the testing can publish them and collaborate on solving common problems (like interpreting test results, making build times faster, increasing the test coverage, detecting regressions etc.) With one of my colleagues, we will submit a microconference proposal that could serve as the starting point for the followup discussions about these topics. We would like to get feedback from kernel developers and maintainers about their expectations for testing and receiving results, as well as discuss the collaboration with other testing/CI projects. Veronika Kabatova CKI Project [1] https://cki-project.org/ > Thanks! > Sasha and Dhaval >