From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750794AbdALFX5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:23:57 -0500 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:2629 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750714AbdALFXz (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 00:23:55 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.33,348,1477983600"; d="scan'208";a="1111417187" From: "Zheng, Lv" To: "Ye, Xiaolong" CC: "Wysocki, Rafael J" , "Moore, Robert" , LKML , Linus Torvalds , "lkp@01.org" Subject: RE: [lkp-developer] [ACPICA] 174cc7187e: kmsg.ACPI_Error:Mutex[ACPI_MTX_Tables]already_acquired_by_this_thread[#](#/utmutex-#) Thread-Topic: [lkp-developer] [ACPICA] 174cc7187e: kmsg.ACPI_Error:Mutex[ACPI_MTX_Tables]already_acquired_by_this_thread[#](#/utmutex-#) Thread-Index: AQHSbHap+LA3i4rEh0OzPdLu/k5l1KE0Tn9A Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 05:23:50 +0000 Message-ID: <1AE640813FDE7649BE1B193DEA596E886CE2AB9B@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <20170112015256.GB19308@yexl-desktop> In-Reply-To: <20170112015256.GB19308@yexl-desktop> Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-titus-metadata-40: eyJDYXRlZ29yeUxhYmVscyI6IiIsIk1ldGFkYXRhIjp7Im5zIjoiaHR0cDpcL1wvd3d3LnRpdHVzLmNvbVwvbnNcL0ludGVsMyIsImlkIjoiMTdkNDY0ZjAtMTExMC00M2U3LWIwZTUtYzBiMTJkNmI4NDVmIiwicHJvcHMiOlt7Im4iOiJDVFBDbGFzc2lmaWNhdGlvbiIsInZhbHMiOlt7InZhbHVlIjoiQ1RQX0lDIn1dfV19LCJTdWJqZWN0TGFiZWxzIjpbXSwiVE1DVmVyc2lvbiI6IjE1LjkuNi42IiwiVHJ1c3RlZExhYmVsSGFzaCI6Ik1wdjN0MmtSUzdGOVJlbTZ2OXB5OXp2dDBPaEtZRmlXZzJ0TlVSRXIralE9In0= x-ctpclassification: CTP_IC x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Xiaolong I noticed the tested version in your the test dmesg: Linux version 4.9.0-rc5 While the commit bisected should be in v4.10-rc1. Does that mean your test tree doesn't contain some basic lock fixes? Thanks and best regards Lv > From: lkp-developer-request@eclists.intel.com [mailto:lkp-developer-request@eclists.intel.com] On > Behalf Of Ye, Xiaolong > Subject: [lkp-developer] [ACPICA] 174cc7187e: > kmsg.ACPI_Error:Mutex[ACPI_MTX_Tables]already_acquired_by_this_thread[#](#/utmutex-#) > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit: > > commit: 174cc7187e6f088942c8e74daa7baff7b44b33c9 ("ACPICA: Tables: Back port acpi_get_table_with_size() > and early_acpi_os_unmap_memory() from Linux kernel") > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > in testcase: phoronix-test-suite > with following parameters: > > need_x: true > test: jxrendermark-1.2.0 > cpufreq_governor: performance > > test-description: The Phoronix Test Suite is the most comprehensive testing and benchmarking platform > available that provides an extensible framework for which new tests can be easily added. > test-url: http://www.phoronix-test-suite.com/ > > > on test machine: 16 threads Nehalem-EP with 16G memory > > caused below changes: > > > [ 2.043693] ACPI Error: Mutex [ACPI_MTX_Tables] already acquired by this thread [497483776] > (20160930/utmutex-254) > [ 2.054084] ACPI Error: Mutex [0x2] is not acquired, cannot release (20160930/utmutex-326) > > To reproduce: > > git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git > cd lkp-tests > bin/lkp install job.yaml # job file is attached in this email > bin/lkp run job.yaml > > > > Thanks, > Xiaolong