From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757175AbaISObj (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:31:39 -0400 Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:3693 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756698AbaISObh convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:31:37 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,555,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="478695399" From: "Chew, Kean Ho" To: "Bryan O'Donoghue" , "heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com" CC: "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "jslaby@suse.cz" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: [PATCHv2] serial: 8250: Add Quark X1000 to 8250 PCI driver Thread-Topic: [PATCHv2] serial: 8250: Add Quark X1000 to 8250 PCI driver Thread-Index: AQHP092crDRkALQTgEOe6wm98ip9IZwHw3eAgAAKMoCAAIbxQP//kXAAgACG10D//3+vgIAAl61g Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 14:31:32 +0000 Message-ID: <1E478852902BF549B22CC4F16C2AE67C0F4724D1@PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com> References: <1411112629-3238-1-git-send-email-pure.logic@nexus-software.ie> <20140919105833.GB31784@xps8300> <541C14E7.8020208@nexus-software.ie> <1E478852902BF549B22CC4F16C2AE67C0F472359@PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com> <541C295A.6020101@nexus-software.ie> <1E478852902BF549B22CC4F16C2AE67C0F47241C@PGSMSX108.gar.corp.intel.com> <541C2ED3.7080206@nexus-software.ie> In-Reply-To: <541C2ED3.7080206@nexus-software.ie> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [172.30.20.206] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Hi Ho. > > Do you have an idea when ? > > I guess if we're saying the simple patch which works right now - should be > rejected in favour of alternative code coming - then at a minimum could you > please give an indication of when that alternative code will be available ? > > Otherwise I think it makes sense to enable the hardware now - using the > bog-standard means of doing that - just like BYT and others :) Make sense. I go with Hekki's direction.