From: Dmitry Osipenko <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Jon Hunter <email@example.com>,
Sameer Pujar <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S driver
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 19:27:11 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw)
22.01.2020 14:52, Jon Hunter пишет:
> On 22/01/2020 07:16, Sameer Pujar wrote:
>>>>>>>> +static int tegra210_i2s_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>>> + pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>>>> + if (!pm_runtime_status_suspended(&pdev->dev))
>>>>>>>> + tegra210_i2s_runtime_suspend(&pdev->dev);
>>>>>>> This breaks device's RPM refcounting if it was disabled in the active
>>>>>>> state. This code should be removed. At most you could warn about the
>>>>>>> unxpected RPM state here, but it shouldn't be necessary.
>>>>>> I guess this was added for safety and explicit suspend keeps clock
>>>>>> Not sure if ref-counting of the device matters when runtime PM is
>>>>>> disabled and device is removed.
>>>>>> I see few drivers using this way.
>>>>> It should matter (if I'm not missing something) because RPM should
>>>>> be in
>>>>> a wrecked state once you'll try to re-load the driver's module. Likely
>>>>> that those few other drivers are wrong.
>>>> Once the driver is re-loaded and RPM is enabled, I don't think it
>>>> would use
>>>> the same 'dev' and the corresponding ref count. Doesn't it use the new
>>>> If RPM is not working for some reason, most likely it would be the case
>>>> for other
>>>> devices. What best driver can do is probably do a force suspend during
>>>> removal if
>>>> already not done. I would prefer to keep, since multiple drivers still
>>>> have it,
>>>> unless there is a real harm in doing so.
>>> I took a closer look and looks like the counter actually should be
>>> reset. Still I don't think that it's a good practice to make changes
>>> underneath of RPM, it may strike back.
>> If RPM is broken, it probably would have been caught during device usage.
>> I will remove explicit suspend here if no any concerns from other folks.
> I recall that this was the preferred way of doing this from the RPM
> folks. Tegra30 I2S driver does the same and Stephen had pointed me to
> this as a reference.
> I believe that this is meant to ensure that the
> device is always powered-off regardless of it RPM is enabled or not and
> what the current state is.
Yes, it was kinda actual for the case of unavailable RPM.
Anyways, /I think/ variant like this should have been more preferred:
> Now for Tegra210 (or actually 64-bit Tegra) RPM is always enabled and so
> we don't need to worry about the !RPM case. However, I still don't see
> the harm in this.
There is no real harm today, but:
1. I'd prefer to be very careful with RPM in general, based on
2. It should be a bug if device isn't RPM-suspended during
of driver's removal. Thus the real problem needs to be fixed
rather than worked around.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-22 16:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-20 14:23 [PATCH 0/9] add ASoC components for AHUB Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 1/9] dt-bindings: sound: tegra: add DT binding " Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 2/9] ASoC: tegra: add support for CIF programming Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 15:58 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-21 4:41 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 16:04 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:11 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-28 22:40 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 3/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based DMIC driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 4/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based I2S driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 5:15 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-21 14:21 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-21 16:03 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-22 4:32 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 6:23 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-22 7:16 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 11:52 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-22 16:27 ` Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
2020-01-23 9:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-23 15:16 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 9:07 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-24 9:51 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-24 14:04 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:22 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-29 3:41 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-02-14 14:05 ` Jon Hunter
2020-02-18 1:00 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-02-19 16:10 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-22 16:26 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 5/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based AHUB driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 1:18 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 3:39 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 4:28 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 9:45 ` Jon Hunter
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 6/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra186 based DSPK driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 7/9] ASoC: tegra: add Tegra210 based ADMAIF driver Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 1:28 ` [alsa-devel] " Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-24 3:27 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-24 4:25 ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-01-27 5:08 ` Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 8/9] arm64: tegra: add AHUB components for few Tegra chips Sameer Pujar
2020-01-20 14:23 ` [PATCH 9/9] arm64: tegra: enable AHUB modules " Sameer Pujar
2020-01-28 10:49 ` [PATCH 0/9] add ASoC components for AHUB Sameer Pujar
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).