linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: liulongfang <liulongfang@huawei.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <mathias.nyman@intel.com>,
	<liudongdong3@huawei.com>, <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com>,
	<yisen.zhuang@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] USB:XHCI:skip hub registration
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 11:11:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1abf8a09-4209-e000-f608-8664a4964670@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210416152021.GA42403@rowland.harvard.edu>

On 2021/4/16 23:20, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:03:21AM +0800, liulongfang wrote:
>> On 2021/4/15 22:43, Alan Stern wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:22:38PM +0800, Longfang Liu wrote:
>>>> When the number of ports on the USB hub is 0, skip the registration
>>>> operation of the USB hub.
>>>>
>>>> The current Kunpeng930's XHCI hardware controller is defective. The number
>>>> of ports on its USB3.0 bus controller is 0, and the number of ports on
>>>> the USB2.0 bus controller is 1.
>>>>
>>>> In order to solve this problem that the USB3.0 controller does not have
>>>> a port which causes the registration of the hub to fail, this patch passes
>>>> the defect information by adding flags in the quirks of xhci and usb_hcd,
>>>> and finally skips the registration process of the hub directly according
>>>> to the results of these flags when the hub is initialized.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Longfang Liu <liulongfang@huawei.com>
>>>
>>> The objections that Greg raised are all good ones.
>>>
>>> But even aside from them, this patch doesn't actually do what the 
>>> description says.  The patch doesn't remove the call to usb_add_hcd 
>>> for the USB-3 bus.  If you simply skipped that call (and the 
>>> corresponding call to usb_remove_hcd) when there are no 
>>> ports on the root hub, none of the stuff in this patch would be needed.
>>>
>>> Alan Stern
>>>
>>
>> "[RFC PATCH] USB:XHCI:Adjust the log level of hub"
> 
> I don't understand.  What patch is that?  Do you have a URL for it?
> 
URL: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-usb/patch/1616666652-37920-1-git-send-email-liulongfang@huawei.com/
Thanks
Longfang.

>> The current method is an improved method of the above patch.
>> This patch just make it skip registering USB-3 root hub if that hub has no ports,
> 
> No, that isn't what this patch does.
> 
> If the root hub wasn't registered, hub_probe wouldn't get called.  But 
> with your patch, the system tries to register the root hub, and it does 
> call hub_probe, and then that function fails with a warning message.
> 
> The way to _really_ akip registering the root hub is to change the 
> xhci-hcd code.  Make it skip calling usb_add_hcd.
> 
>> after skipping registering, no port will not report error log,the goal of this
>> patch is reached without error log output.
> 
> Why do you want to get rid of the error log output?  There really _is_ 
> an error, because the USB-3 hardware on your controller is defective.  
> Since the hardware is buggy, we _should_ print an error message in the 
> kernel log.
> 
> Alan Stern
> .
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-17  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15 12:22 [RFC PATCH] USB:XHCI:skip hub registration Longfang Liu
2021-04-15 12:34 ` Greg KH
2021-04-16  2:43   ` liulongfang
2021-04-16  5:16     ` Greg KH
2021-04-15 14:43 ` Alan Stern
2021-04-16  2:03   ` liulongfang
2021-04-16 15:20     ` Alan Stern
2021-04-17  3:11       ` liulongfang [this message]
2021-04-17  6:48       ` liulongfang
2021-04-17 15:31         ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1abf8a09-4209-e000-f608-8664a4964670@huawei.com \
    --to=liulongfang@huawei.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kong.kongxinwei@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liudongdong3@huawei.com \
    --cc=mathias.nyman@intel.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=yisen.zhuang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).