linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
	Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com>,
	"christian.melki@t2data.com" <christian.melki@t2data.com>,
	"andrew@lunn.ch" <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	"linux@armlinux.org.uk" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO bus resume back
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2021 11:32:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ceca7ac-ed6f-de73-6afb-34fd0a7e5db3@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b34ccbf5-18eb-681b-3336-4c93325c2a43@gmail.com>



On 4/6/2021 4:42 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> 
> Waiting for ANEG_COMPLETE to be set wouldn't be a good option. Aneg may never
> complete for different reasons, e.g. no physical link. And even if we use a
> timeout this may add unwanted delays.
> 
>> Do you have any other insights that can help me further locate the issue? Thanks.
>>
> 
> I think current MAC/PHY PM handling isn't perfect. Often we have the following
> scenario:
> 
> *suspend*
> 1. PHY is suspended (mdio_bus_phy_suspend)
> 2. MAC suspend callback (typically involving phy_stop())
> 
> *resume*
> 1. MAC resume callback (typically involving phy_start())
> 2. PHY is resumed (mdio_bus_phy_resume), incl. calling phy_init_hw()
> 
> Calling phy_init_hw() after phy_start() doesn't look right.
> It seems to work in most cases, but there's a certain risk
> that phy_init_hw() overwrites something, e.g. the advertised
> modes.
> I think we have two valid scenarios:
> 
> 1. phylib PM callbacks are used, then the MAC driver shouldn't
>    touch the PHY in its PM callbacks, especially not call
>    phy_stop/phy_start.
> 
> 2. MAC PM callbacks take care also of the PHY. Then I think we would
>    need a flag at the phy_device telling it to make the PHY PM
>    callbacks a no-op.

Maybe part of the problem is that the FEC is calling phy_{stop,start} in
its suspend/resume callbacks instead of phy_{suspend,resume} which would
play nice and tell the MDIO bus PM callbacks that the PHY has already
been suspended.

I am also suspicious about whether Wake-on-LAN actually works with the
FEC, you cannot wake from LAN if the PHY is stopped and powered down.
-- 
Florian

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-06 18:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-04 10:07 [PATCH] net: phy: fix PHY possibly unwork after MDIO bus resume back Joakim Zhang
2021-04-04 14:09 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-04 22:48   ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-05  8:43     ` Christian Melki
2021-04-05 12:09       ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-05 13:53         ` Christian Melki
2021-04-05 14:58           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-05 23:18             ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-06  2:07         ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-06  6:28           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-06 10:07             ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-06 11:42               ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-06 18:21                 ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-07  1:43                   ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-07  7:12                     ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-07  7:46                       ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-07 10:05                         ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-07 10:21                           ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-07 10:38                             ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-06 18:32                 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-04-06 18:43                   ` Heiner Kallweit
2021-04-06 18:47                     ` Florian Fainelli
2021-04-06  2:06       ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-06  1:39     ` Joakim Zhang
2021-04-06  1:37   ` Joakim Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ceca7ac-ed6f-de73-6afb-34fd0a7e5db3@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=christian.melki@t2data.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=qiangqing.zhang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).