linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kars Mulder" <kerneldev@karsmulder.nl>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Kai-Heng Feng" <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: Writing to a const pointer: is this  supposed to happen?
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:25:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1da2-5ef37080-31-6d4cde00@228034409> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200624131016.GA1807770@kroah.com>

On Wednesday, June 24, 2020 15:10 CEST, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: 
> Have you hit any runtime issues with this code doing this?  These
> strings should be held in writable memory, right?  Or do you see a
> codepath where that is not the case?

I haven't ran into any issues with it; I was just looking at the code
as reference for a patch I'm working on.

I initially assumed that casting a const pointer to non-const and
writing to it would be undefined behaviour, but after reading through
the C99 standard I can't find an unambiguous statement whether it is
undefined behaviour even if the const pointer points to an object that
was originally non-const (like char* -> const char* -> char* casts); it
only says it is undefined behaviour if the object was defined with the
const qualifier.

I should probably stop bothering you with my newbie questions.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 15:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-22 11:35 Writing to a const pointer: is this supposed to happen? Kars Mulder
2020-06-23 19:55 ` Pavel Machek
2020-06-24 12:34   ` Kars Mulder
2020-06-24 13:10     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-06-24 15:25       ` Kars Mulder [this message]
2020-06-27 10:24         ` David Laight
2020-07-01 23:03           ` Kars Mulder
2020-07-02  7:55             ` David Laight
2020-07-02 21:48               ` Kars Mulder
2020-07-03  8:13                 ` David Laight
2020-07-03 13:23                   ` Kars Mulder
2020-07-04 11:55                     ` Pavel Machek
2020-07-05 21:53                       ` [PATCH] usb: core: fix quirks_param_set() writing to a const pointer Kars Mulder
2020-07-06 10:34                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 12:57                           ` Kars Mulder
2020-07-06 13:07                             ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-07-06 13:58                               ` Kars Mulder
     [not found] <CAHp75Ve4O+OmVttjhtKepFWwZLU6tFMx5vNpPVJdB58mcLFm3w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-04 20:32 ` Writing to a const pointer: is this supposed to happen? Kars Mulder
2020-07-04 20:54   ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-07-05 18:27     ` Kars Mulder
     [not found] <CAHp75Vf9ygQ++DL4ETMy54d=x6oS1qqHLhfyh58f7JCVvM17yA@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-05 19:38 ` Kars Mulder
     [not found] <CAHp75Ve3m=UK9r2o8bDotQWQBLz-fV8CO_VcTmWjdLW1p5wE-w@mail.gmail.com>
2020-07-05 20:48 ` Kars Mulder

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1da2-5ef37080-31-6d4cde00@228034409 \
    --to=kerneldev@karsmulder.nl \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).