From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
To: Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@somainline.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: align RPM regulators node name with bindings
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2022 12:01:05 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1e19ae05-3cc2-d913-dd2c-a1c4be222508@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220901085609.95624-2-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On 01/09/2022 11:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Node names should be generic and new DT schema expects RPM regulators
> node to be just "regulators". Rename them while keeping similar naming
> style within PMIC families on different boards, e.g.
> pm660l-regulators -> regulators-0
> pm660-regulators -> regulators-1
> which creates in few places big diff.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Not tested on hardware, but I do not expect functional impact.
> ---
Eh, crap, I found few more of nodes to fix. There will be a v2.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-09-01 9:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-09-01 8:56 [PATCH RFT 1/3] dt-bindings: soc: qcom: smd-rpm: add PMIC regulators nodes Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-01 8:56 ` [PATCH RFT 2/3] arm64: dts: qcom: align RPM regulators node name with bindings Krzysztof Kozlowski
2022-09-01 9:01 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2022-09-01 8:56 ` [PATCH RFT 3/3] ARM: " Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1e19ae05-3cc2-d913-dd2c-a1c4be222508@linaro.org \
--to=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@somainline.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).