From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA69C77B75 for ; Mon, 22 May 2023 13:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234219AbjEVNIO (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2023 09:08:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:35784 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233833AbjEVNIK (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 May 2023 09:08:10 -0400 Received: from mail.loongson.cn (mail.loongson.cn [114.242.206.163]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5162F1AD; Mon, 22 May 2023 06:07:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from loongson.cn (unknown [10.20.42.35]) by gateway (Coremail) with SMTP id _____8AxNPAkaWtklPIKAA--.18687S3; Mon, 22 May 2023 21:07:48 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.20.42.35] (unknown [10.20.42.35]) by localhost.localdomain (Coremail) with SMTP id AQAAf8CxDbMjaWtk+BtvAA--.55849S3; Mon, 22 May 2023 21:07:47 +0800 (CST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 0/2] spi: loongson: add bus driver for the loongson spi To: Mark Brown Cc: Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jianmin Lv , wanghongliang@loongson.cn, Liu Peibao , loongson-kernel@lists.loongnix.cn, zhuyinbo@loongson.cn References: <20230522071030.5193-1-zhuyinbo@loongson.cn> <3c15d22f-4f94-4cc5-96a8-f565e58c66b9@sirena.org.uk> <4dfa5245-d330-f432-e81e-163053687d42@loongson.cn> From: zhuyinbo Message-ID: <1e8c3e92-4043-11f2-e7a7-0bf4273c65d8@loongson.cn> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 21:07:47 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux loongarch64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: AQAAf8CxDbMjaWtk+BtvAA--.55849S3 X-CM-SenderInfo: 52kx5xhqerqz5rrqw2lrqou0/ X-Coremail-Antispam: 1Uk129KBjvdXoW7Jr1kKFWfuw1kXFy5Jr4DCFg_yoWDtrbEkF W0kFyxC34Uta18Aa1xGF4FvrW3tF40qw18CrWvqw47Gw15XF4DG3yDJ3s7u3Z5AayfKF1D u393J39FgwnxJjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUbb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8wcxFpf9Il3svdxBIdaVrn0 xqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2j2Jv73VFW2AGmfu7bjvjm3AaLaJ3UjIYCTnIWjp_UUUY 07CY07I20VC2zVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6rWj6s0DM7CIcVAFz4kK6r1Y6r17M28lY4IEw2 IIxxk0rwA2F7IY1VAKz4vEj48ve4kI8wA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_JF4l84AC jcxK6xIIjxv20xvEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJr0_GcWl84 ACjcxK6I8E87Iv6xkF7I0E14v26rxl6s0DM2AIxVAIcxkEcVAq07x20xvEncxIr21l57IF 6xkI12xvs2x26I8E6xACxx1l5I8CrVACY4xI64kE6c02F40Ex7xfMcIj6xIIjxv20xvE14 v26r1Y6r17McIj6I8E87Iv67AKxVWxJVW8Jr1lOx8S6xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UM4x0Y48I cVAKI48JMxk0xIA0c2IEe2xFo4CEbIxvr21l42xK82IYc2Ij64vIr41l42xK82IY6x8Erc xFaVAv8VWrMxC20s026xCaFVCjc4AY6r1j6r4UMI8I3I0E5I8CrVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lx2Iq xVCjr7xvwVAFwI0_JrI_JrWlx4CE17CEb7AF67AKxVWUtVW8ZwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvE14 v26r1j6r1xMIIF0xvE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x0267AKxVWUJVW8JwCI42IY6xAIw20EY4v20xva j40_Jr0_JF4lIxAIcVC2z280aVAFwI0_Cr0_Gr1UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr 0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07UWlk3UUUUU= Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 在 2023/5/22 下午7:56, Mark Brown 写道: > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 07:44:49PM +0800, zhuyinbo wrote: > >> The recently patch was as follows, It seems no issue for patch apply >> them, Maybe it is the 0/2 patch issue ? this 0/2 patch wasn't a valid >> patch and it need was skipped. > > What's causing problem is that you patched MAINTAINERS in both patches > but also used the wrong subject line for the first patch so I was having > to fix it up by hand every time. Hi Mark, I learn about what you said that bindings patch and spi driver change a same MAINTAINERS file, but It seems not cause apply fail if the patch series apply in order. I'm sorry, I don't understand the reason why my spi series patch apply failed, then I have a look about your spi ci tree and that what I need to do is just change the title of [1/2] patch like this in next version ? Correcting the title can solve the problem of patch series apply failure in your tree ? actually, I don't reproduce that apply faile issue in your current spi tree and for-next branch. spi: add loongson spi bindings Thanks Yinbo