From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.4 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94940C433DB for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6137464F5F for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 00:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233957AbhBDAec (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:34:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44662 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231817AbhBDAea (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:34:30 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [IPv6:2001:8b0:10b:1231::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C8DEC061573; Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:33:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type: In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=BG5xo57883wZFg8LT27wpBNLDvItg9xhNzOkMkfoe78=; b=qnVs1N+XmTfCeuJFXLBv1CEQ/f Swrxm7740kgfWXderYwwkfa7mlqKgktEJtO9OD5n+jNpkuC4aZnw4LFMpzN7LmO4pAFThuc75vLUk i12t76pBsj8R/Sj1qb9zXfGjp1NsCvhjzL4vOWrtEK6h866ZW6WvUhX9VF7B/XhGGemfusuvJutWq 2WQgX6XNrm9yOWvNx4buJfjr6Co7nex3BEhsGMtZb6jLc5bB6KTD0hUOVP0gJjhOwwTmZTmvBLW8L 7h51zYZmfYkX8pZ1h7v2PBz0K8jmfJVXvfvGFKjmP0xr+7muc+ONSuufBP10BZN/uPJ8hxWNb6Azj 46JoVBig==; Received: from [2601:1c0:6280:3f0::aec2] by merlin.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1l7Sac-0004GE-Aj; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 00:33:42 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt2x00: remove duplicate word in comment To: wengjianfeng Cc: stf_xl@wp.pl, helmut.schaa@googlemail.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wengjianfeng References: <20210203063850.15844-1-samirweng1979@163.com> <6bf90f62-f14e-9c4a-748b-4923fcae9bef@infradead.org> <20210204083007.000069d2@163.com> From: Randy Dunlap Message-ID: <1ee1b354-0550-3fd8-f547-10827b3974ad@infradead.org> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 16:33:37 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20210204083007.000069d2@163.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2/3/21 4:30 PM, wengjianfeng wrote: > On Wed, 3 Feb 2021 07:16:17 -0800 > Randy Dunlap wrote: > >> On 2/2/21 10:38 PM, samirweng1979 wrote: >>> From: wengjianfeng >>> >>> remove duplicate word 'we' in comment >>> >>> Signed-off-by: wengjianfeng >>> --- >>> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c index >>> c861811..7158152 100644 --- >>> a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c +++ >>> b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00crypto.c @@ -179,7 >>> +179,7 @@ void rt2x00crypto_rx_insert_iv(struct sk_buff *skb, >>> * Make room for new data. There are 2 possibilities >>> * either the alignment is already present between >>> * the 802.11 header and payload. In that case we >>> - * we have to move the header less then the iv_len >>> + * have to move the header less then the iv_len >> >> s/then/than/ >> >>> * since we can use the already available l2pad bytes >>> * for the iv data. >>> * When the alignment must be added manually we must >>> >> >> > > Hi Randy, > So you means add it for byte alignment, right? if yes,just ignore > the patch. thanks. No, I mean that there is a typo there also: "then" should be changed to "than" while you are making changes. thanks. -- ~Randy