linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: irq: Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE handling in migrate_one_irq()
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2019 16:47:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1fcb35b7-4105-e4b7-a528-eb48be876edf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9288fdeb-8eb1-28ca-f950-ccf36d63688a@arm.com>

Hi Marc,

On 1/8/19 3:16 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Hi Dietmar,
> 
> On 08/01/2019 13:58, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
>> Arm TC2 (multi_v7_defconfig plus CONFIG_ARM_BIG_LITTLE_CPUFREQ=y and
>> CONFIG_ARM_VEXPRESS_SPC_CPUFREQ=y) fails hotplug stress tests.
>>
>> This issue was tracked down to a missing copy of the new affinity
>> cpumask of the vexpress-spc interrupt into struct
>> irq_common_data.affinity when the interrupt is migrated in
>> migrate_one_irq().
>>
>> Commit 0407daceedfe ("irqchip/gic: Return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE in the
>> set_affinity method") changed the return value of the irq_set_affinity()
>> function of the GIC from IRQ_SET_MASK_OK to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE.
>>
>> In migrate_one_irq() if the current irq affinity mask and the cpu
>> online mask do not share any CPU, the affinity mask is set to the cpu
>> online mask. In this case (ret == true) and when the irq chip
>> function irq_set_affinity() returns successfully (IRQ_SET_MASK_OK),
>> struct irq_common_data.affinity should also be updated.
>>
>> Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE next to IRQ_SET_MASK_OK when checking that the
>> irq chip function irq_set_affinity() returns successfully.
>>
>> Commit 2cb625478f8c ("genirq: Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE to support
>> stacked irqchip") only added IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE handling to
>> irq_do_set_affinity() in the irq core and not to the Arm32 irq code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
>> ---
>>
>> The hotplug issue on Arm TC2 happens because the vexpress-spc interrupt
>> (irq=22) is affine to CPU0. This occurs since it is setup early when the
>> cpu_online_mask is still 0.
>> But the problem with the missing copy of the affinity mask should occur
>> with every interrupt which is forced to migrate.
>>
>> With additional debug in irq_setup_affinity():
>>
>> [0.000619] irq_setup_affinity(): irq=17 mask=0 cpu_online_mask=0 set=0-4
>> [0.007065] irq_setup_affinity(): irq=22 mask=0 cpu_online_mask=0 set=0-4
>> [3.372907] irq_setup_affinity(): irq=47 mask=0-4 cpu_online_mask=0-4
>> set=0-4
>>
>> cat /proc/interrupts
>>             CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3       CPU4
>> 22:        316          0          0          0          0     GIC-0 127
>> Level     vexpress-spc
>>
>> cat /proc/irq/22/smp_affinity_list
>> 0

[...]

> 
> On the arm64 side, we've solved the exact same issue by getting rid of
> this code and using the generic implementation. See 217d453d473c5
> ("arm64: fix a migrating irq bug when hotplug cpu"), which uses
> irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu instead.
> 
> I'm not sure there is much value in not using the core code in this case.

Thanks for the hint! Much more elegant! I tried the following on TC2 and 
it worked just fine. I'm not aware on any drawbacks of using the generic 
irq migration for Arm32 as well.

-- >8 --

diff --git a/arch/arm/Kconfig b/arch/arm/Kconfig
index 664e918e2624..26524b75970a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/Kconfig
@@ -1400,6 +1400,7 @@ config NR_CPUS
  config HOTPLUG_CPU
         bool "Support for hot-pluggable CPUs"
         depends on SMP
+       select GENERIC_IRQ_MIGRATION
         help
           Say Y here to experiment with turning CPUs off and on.  CPUs
           can be controlled through /sys/devices/system/cpu.
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
index c883fcbe93b6..46d41140df27 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/irq.h
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
  struct irqaction;
  struct pt_regs;
-extern void migrate_irqs(void);

  extern void asm_do_IRQ(unsigned int, struct pt_regs *);
  void handle_IRQ(unsigned int, struct pt_regs *);
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
index 9908dacf9229..844861368cd5 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,6 @@
  #include <linux/smp.h>
  #include <linux/init.h>
  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
-#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
  #include <linux/errno.h>
  #include <linux/list.h>
  #include <linux/kallsyms.h>
@@ -109,64 +108,3 @@ int __init arch_probe_nr_irqs(void)
         return nr_irqs;
  }
  #endif
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-static bool migrate_one_irq(struct irq_desc *desc)
-{
-       struct irq_data *d = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
-       const struct cpumask *affinity = irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d);
-       struct irq_chip *c;
-       bool ret = false;
-
-       /*
-        * If this is a per-CPU interrupt, or the affinity does not
-        * include this CPU, then we have nothing to do.
-        */
-       if (irqd_is_per_cpu(d) || !cpumask_test_cpu(smp_processor_id(), 
affinity))
-               return false;
-
-       if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
-               affinity = cpu_online_mask;
-               ret = true;
-       }
-
-       c = irq_data_get_irq_chip(d);
-       if (!c->irq_set_affinity)
-               pr_debug("IRQ%u: unable to set affinity\n", d->irq);
-       else if (c->irq_set_affinity(d, affinity, false) == 
IRQ_SET_MASK_OK && ret)
-               cpumask_copy(irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), affinity);
-
-       return ret;
-}
-
-/*
- * The current CPU has been marked offline.  Migrate IRQs off this CPU.
- * If the affinity settings do not allow other CPUs, force them onto any
- * available CPU.
- *
- * Note: we must iterate over all IRQs, whether they have an attached
- * action structure or not, as we need to get chained interrupts too.
- */
-void migrate_irqs(void)
-{
-       unsigned int i;
-       struct irq_desc *desc;
-       unsigned long flags;
-
-       local_irq_save(flags);
-
-       for_each_irq_desc(i, desc) {
-               bool affinity_broken;
-
-               raw_spin_lock(&desc->lock);
-               affinity_broken = migrate_one_irq(desc);
-               raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
-
-               if (affinity_broken)
-                       pr_warn_ratelimited("IRQ%u no longer affine to 
CPU%u\n",
-                               i, smp_processor_id());
-       }
-
-       local_irq_restore(flags);
-}
-#endif /* CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
index 3bf82232b1be..1d6f5ea522f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/smp.c
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void)
         /*
          * OK - migrate IRQs away from this CPU
          */
-       migrate_irqs();
+       irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu();

         /*
          * Flush user cache and TLB mappings, and then remove this CPU

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-09 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-08 13:58 [PATCH] ARM: irq: Add IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE handling in migrate_one_irq() Dietmar Eggemann
2019-01-08 14:16 ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-09 15:47   ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2019-01-09 16:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2019-01-10 10:12       ` Dietmar Eggemann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1fcb35b7-4105-e4b7-a528-eb48be876edf@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).