From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E0C1C433E6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB3364DF6 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232194AbhA1P3L (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:29:11 -0500 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:35124 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231924AbhA1P2y (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:28:54 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SFLm9C068637; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:57 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=message-id : subject : from : to : cc : date : in-reply-to : references : content-type : mime-version : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=T59iizbde6nlJE+dn/NHQkyZoh4iipcPhYD4lPePkLY=; b=XsSWgVisg/8XGSJAWQKjTEIfZvmQI5cm2hX54Aeb0OJXI9Z01anPM0q+L+Ic2iMu7vFc M6q4B6pwc5veCXkHTRKHNALAbV6Qgm9nMgIEzVdofT+Ce4PfF3nuQ1JdA5ObqnEDUwWl AbWKQCBL35kUAf6OjSFrcaIW9Ck+jx77md5brV/OBtoQB9CDrGfrdCbYRLpcIRzrHPQI 4JfCWXLZItTaNQaiBdA6M0MTf3867sXyUwYyWWVdbtla805GEiQM2X5lk9RCfAEQ+9ky 4CyuGBENYaezc+H9P8H4vsFQCFRUQgnQr6/ofrtKr6Lcnmbae1w7yeEAM7eaRv4147xp 9A== Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36bqx3ykr9-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:57 -0500 Received: from m0098399.ppops.net (m0098399.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 10SFMV3B071534; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:56 -0500 Received: from ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (47.49.7a9f.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [159.122.73.71]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 36bqx3ykpx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:56 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02fra.de.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 10SFMPY6019181; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:54 GMT Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by ppma02fra.de.ibm.com with ESMTP id 368be8ak9s-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:53 +0000 Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.59]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 10SFRp4A45547890 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:51 GMT Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id B694AA4053; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F63FA4040; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from li-f45666cc-3089-11b2-a85c-c57d1a57929f.ibm.com (unknown [9.160.115.82]) by d06av23.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jan 2021 15:27:48 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1ff03fa10f78884b399e2c20ca4e376b575d5b0f.camel@linux.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx/mokx entries From: Mimi Zohar To: David Howells , Eric Snowberg Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, jarkko@kernel.org, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, michal.lkml@markovi.net, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, ardb@kernel.org, lszubowi@redhat.com, javierm@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 10:27:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3568165.1611846997@warthog.procyon.org.uk> References: <20210122181054.32635-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <3568165.1611846997@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-14.el8) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.343,18.0.737 definitions=2021-01-28_08:2021-01-28,2021-01-28 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 mlxscore=0 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1011 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2101280074 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi David, On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 15:16 +0000, David Howells wrote: > Which tree do you envision this going through? EFI or keyrings - or are you > going to ask Linus to pull it directly? I can pull it if it should go through > the keyrings tree. There's one more patch, yet to be posted, which updates asymmetric_verify(). As long as you're willing to upstream all of the patches, that's fine with me. thanks! Mimi