linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
To: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>,
	linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: meson: g12a: fix gp0 and hifi ranges
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2021 11:45:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1jim45juf1.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <979eb290-6fc2-38df-0596-867b82d22226@baylibre.com>


On Thu 29 Apr 2021 at 11:20, Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> wrote:

> On 29/04/2021 11:03, Jerome Brunet wrote:
>> While some SoC samples are able to lock with a PLL factor of 55, others
>> samples can't. ATM, a minimum of 60 appears to work on all the samples
>> I have tried.
>> 
>> Even with 60, it sometimes takes a long time for the PLL to eventually
>> lock. The documentation says that the minimum rate of these PLLs DCO
>> should be 3GHz, a factor of 125. Let's use that to be on the safe side.
>> 
>> With factor range changed, the PLL seems to lock quickly (enough) so far.
>> It is still unclear if the range was the only reason for the delay.
>> 
>> Fixes: 085a4ea93d54 ("clk: meson: g12a: add peripheral clock controller")
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c | 2 +-
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c b/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
>> index b080359b4645..a805bac93c11 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
>> @@ -1603,7 +1603,7 @@ static struct clk_regmap g12b_cpub_clk_trace = {
>>  };
>>  
>>  static const struct pll_mult_range g12a_gp0_pll_mult_range = {
>> -	.min = 55,
>> +	.min = 125,
>>  	.max = 255,
>>  };
>>  
>> 
>
> I got other issues with GP0 when trying to use it for DSI on VIM3 & VIM3L.
>
> I had to do change the following to have it lock correctly and achieve rates usable for MIPI-DSI requested bandwidth:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> index cde07f7ebad6..897cd6db5c0f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/clk-pll.c
> @@ -391,9 +391,9 @@ static int meson_clk_pll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
>                 meson_parm_write(clk->map, &pll->frac, frac);
>         }
>
> -       /* If the pll is stopped, bail out now */
> +       /* If the pll is stopped, bail out now * /
>         if (!enabled)
> -               return 0;
> +               return 0;*/

This enables the PLL everytime set_rate() is called :/

>
>         if (meson_clk_pll_enable(hw)) {
>                 pr_warn("%s: pll did not lock, trying to restore old rate %lu\n",
>
> This one is tricky, for DSI the clock rate is set with assigned-clock-rates in DT, but
> then the GP0 is seen as stopped and then the rate is never set.

Audio does the same - PLL is set and enabled afterward. This has been
working so far.

>
> When afterwards we enable the PLL, the rate set in the registers is invalid and never locks,
> this permits setting the rate in the registers even if the PLL is
> stopped.

There something to be explained here cause the register have been set
before bailing out. What is happening ? The pokes before have no effect
or are the value being reset at another point ?

I understand this need to address this concern but it does not seems
related to this particular patch.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c b/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
> index 1b0167b8de3b..08174724a115 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/meson/g12a.c
> @@ -1602,8 +1602,8 @@ static struct clk_regmap g12b_cpub_clk_trace = {
>  };
>
>  static const struct pll_mult_range g12a_gp0_pll_mult_range = {
> -       .min = 55,
> -       .max = 255,
> +       .min = 120,
> +       .max = 168,
>  };
>
> I had to change the min/max to achieve a stable and functional rate of 720MHz after the ODs.
>

How about the range provided in here ? This is range documented by AML
(3GHz < DCO < 6GHz). 168 limits would limit the rate to ~4GHz which is
way below spec and would negatively impact audio clocks.

> Neil


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-29  9:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-29  9:03 [PATCH] clk: meson: g12a: fix gp0 and hifi ranges Jerome Brunet
2021-04-29  9:20 ` Neil Armstrong
2021-04-29  9:45   ` Jerome Brunet [this message]
2021-04-29 12:15     ` Neil Armstrong
2021-04-29 12:16       ` Jerome Brunet
2021-05-20 14:02 ` Neil Armstrong
2021-05-24  9:38   ` Jerome Brunet
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-03-25 10:42 Jerome Brunet
2019-03-25 12:18 ` Neil Armstrong
2019-03-29  8:39   ` Neil Armstrong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1jim45juf1.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com \
    --to=jbrunet@baylibre.com \
    --cc=khilman@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).