From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:49:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:49:05 -0500 Received: from kleopatra.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.150]:36820 "EHLO kleopatra.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 22:48:52 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 04:18:23 +0100 From: David Weinehall To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: fs corruption in 2.4.0-test11? Message-ID: <20001221041823.A15178@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: <20001220164742.A3756@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: <20001220164742.A3756@work.bitmover.com>; from lm@bitmover.com on Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 04:47:42PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > I just need a sanity check - do other pages/blocks sometimes show up in > recently created files in 2.4.0-test11? Mmmm. Yes. I think the final fixes for this went into v2.4.0-test12pre5, but since there's a test13-pre3 out that needs testing, go for that one directly... :^) > I have a (so far) non-reproducible case where the wrong data showed up in > a new file. The nice part is that it was when I was imploding a large > BitKeeper patch so I can run the test case over and over if that would > help find it. If you can reproduce it on test13-pre3, we have something to worry about, if not, feel happy; one bug less to worry about. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/