From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:18:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:18:48 -0500 Received: from zeus.kernel.org ([209.10.41.242]:23529 "EHLO zeus.kernel.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:18:32 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:16:15 +0000 From: "Stephen C. Tweedie" To: bsuparna@in.ibm.com, "Stephen C. Tweedie" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait /notify + callback chains Message-ID: <20010201161615.T11607@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20010201160953.A17058@caldera.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <20010201160953.A17058@caldera.de>; from hch@caldera.de on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:09:53PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:09:53PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:14:58PM +0530, bsuparna@in.ibm.com wrote: > > > > That would require the vfs interfaces themselves (address space > > readpage/writepage ops) to take kiobufs as arguments, instead of struct > > page * . That's not the case right now, is it ? > > No, and with the current kiobufs it would not make sense, because they > are to heavy-weight. Really? In what way? > With page,length,offsett iobufs this makes sense > and is IMHO the way to go. What, you mean adding *extra* stuff to the heavyweight kiobuf makes it lean enough to do the job?? Cheers, Stephen - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/