From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:51:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:51:24 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:10258 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 15:51:18 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 21:50:53 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Manfred Spraul Cc: Ben LaHaise , Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Alan Cox , Steve Lord , Linux Kernel List , kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait Message-ID: <20010206215053.G2975@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <3A806177.59304E88@colorfullife.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3A806177.59304E88@colorfullife.com>; from manfred@colorfullife.com on Tue, Feb 06, 2001 at 09:41:27PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Feb 06 2001, Manfred Spraul wrote: > > =) This is what I'm seeing: lots of processes waiting with wchan == > > __get_request_wait. With async io and a database flushing lots of io > > asynchronously spread out across the disk, the NR_REQUESTS limit is hit > > very quickly. > > > Has that anything to do with kiobuf or buffer head? Nothing > Several kernel functions need a "dontblock" parameter (or a callback, or > a waitqueue address, or a tq_struct pointer). We don't even need that, non-blocking is implicitly applied with READA. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/