From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:36:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:36:11 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:12563 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 6 Feb 2001 19:35:54 -0500 Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2001 01:35:23 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: Ingo Molnar , Ben LaHaise , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Manfred Spraul , Steve Lord , Linux Kernel List , kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait Message-ID: <20010207013523.C9013@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20010207002107.L1167@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010207002107.L1167@redhat.com>; from sct@redhat.com on Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 12:21:07AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 07 2001, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: > > [overhead of 512-byte bhs in the raw IO code is an artificial problem of > > the raw IO code.] > > No, it is a problem of the ll_rw_block interface: buffer_heads need to > be aligned on disk at a multiple of their buffer size. Under the Unix > raw IO interface it is perfectly legal to begin a 128kB IO at offset > 512 bytes into a device. Submitting buffers to lower layers that are not hw sector aligned can't be supported below ll_rw_blk anyway (they can, but look at the problems this has always created), and I would much rather see stuff like this handled outside of there. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/