From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:57:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:57:26 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:34830 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 10:57:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2001 16:55:29 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Mikulas Patocka Cc: Marcelo Tosatti , "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Pavel Machek , Linus Torvalds , Manfred Spraul , Ben LaHaise , Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Steve Lord , Linux Kernel List , kiobuf-io-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Kiobuf-io-devel] RFC: Kernel mechanism: Compound event wait Message-ID: <20010208165529.E3262@suse.de> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz on Thu, Feb 08, 2001 at 04:46:12PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 08 2001, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > Even async IO (ie aio_read/aio_write) should block on the request queue if > > its full in Linus mind. > > This is not problem (you can create queue big enough to handle the load). Well in theory, but in practice this isn't a very good idea. At some point throwing yet more requests in there doesn't make a whole lot of sense. You are basically _always_ going to be able to empty the request list by dirtying lots of data. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/