From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:24:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:24:12 -0500 Received: from 2-113.cwb-adsl.telepar.net.br ([200.193.161.113]:57582 "HELO brinquedo.distro.conectiva") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:24:04 -0500 Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 20:44:58 -0300 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Alan Cox , Mika Kuoppala , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] eth16i.c: don't reference skb after passing it to netif_rx Message-ID: <20010226204457.F8692@conectiva.com.br> Mail-Followup-To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alan Cox , Mika Kuoppala , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.14i X-Url: http://advogato.org/person/acme Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org yet another one. 8) Em Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 08:33:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: Hi, I've just read davem's post at netdev about the brokeness of referencing skbs after passing it to netif_rx, so please consider applying this patch. Ah, this was just added to the Janitor's TODO list at http://bazar.conectiva.com.br/~acme/TODO and I'm doing a quick audit in the net drivers searching for this, maybe some more patches will follow. - Arnaldo --- linux-2.4.2/drivers/net/eth16i.c Tue Feb 13 19:15:05 2001 +++ linux-2.4.2.acme/drivers/net/eth16i.c Mon Feb 26 22:16:19 2001 @@ -1195,10 +1195,6 @@ } skb->protocol=eth_type_trans(skb, dev); - netif_rx(skb); - dev->last_rx = jiffies; - lp->stats.rx_packets++; - lp->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_len; if( eth16i_debug > 5 ) { int i; @@ -1208,6 +1204,10 @@ printk(KERN_DEBUG " %02x", skb->data[i]); printk(KERN_DEBUG ".\n"); } + netif_rx(skb); + dev->last_rx = jiffies; + lp->stats.rx_packets++; + lp->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_len; } /* else */