From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:01:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:00:55 -0500 Received: from mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl ([130.161.34.250]:14858 "EHLO mailhst2.its.tudelft.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 27 Feb 2001 06:00:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 11:56:50 +0100 From: Erik Mouw To: "J . A . Magallon" Cc: David , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Posible bug in gcc Message-ID: <20010227115649.H25658@arthur.ubicom.tudelft.nl> In-Reply-To: <3A9A8489.224CF54C@inf.uji.es> <20010226233013.A2995@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010226233013.A2995@werewolf.able.es>; from jamagallon@able.es on Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:30:13PM +0100 Organization: Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs X-Eric-Conspiracy: There is no conspiracy! Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 11:30:13PM +0100, J . A . Magallon wrote: > On 02.26 David wrote: > > I think I heve found a bug in gcc. I have tried both egcs 1.1.2 (gcc > > 2.91.66) and gcc 2.95.2 versions. > > gcc2.95.2 is sane in irix6.2, irix6.5 and solaris7sparc. > > The optimizer is not in the common front-end ? Yes and no. There is some common code in the optimiser, but each target has its own optimisation tricks for which the code is not shared with other targets. Erik -- J.A.K. (Erik) Mouw, Information and Communication Theory Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Faculty of Information Technology and Systems, Delft University of Technology, PO BOX 5031, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands Phone: +31-15-2783635 Fax: +31-15-2781843 Email: J.A.K.Mouw@its.tudelft.nl WWW: http://www-ict.its.tudelft.nl/~erik/