From: Ingo Oeser <ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, Adam Sampson <azz@gnu.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2001 18:26:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010304182601.D27675@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0102232120531.8568-100000@localhost.localdomain> <Pine.NEB.4.33.0103030053070.14582-100000@io.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.33.0103030053070.14582-100000@io.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de>; from bunk@fs.tum.de on Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 01:03:26AM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > If anybody as a good idea to make this code auto-balancing,
> > please let me know.
>
> I have no idea for auto-balancing but another idea: It's one possibility
> to let the user choose when doing "make *config" what he wants:
>
> - A VM optimized for servers that swaps out applications in favor of
> caching.
> or
> - A VM optimized for workstations that won't swap out applications in
> favor of caching.
I thought about the same thing sometimes (but for other troughput
vs. latency decisions, too).
But I realized, that my very own workstation is also a server,
since it runs an httpd, mysqld, smbd, ftpd etc.
And somtimes the servers become very busy in our LAN[1].
IF we want that tuning, we should have it as a sysctl. Most of it
is already possible with /proc/sys/vm/*, but balancing decisions
are still missing.
And even for servers we need to reduce caching sometimes. Think
of an httpd serving _very_ dynamic content. Or any other
application (e.g. DMBS), that doesn't rely on file system
caching.
A anonymous/file-backed[2] ratio would be VERY handy ;-)
But maybe this will be implemented one day along the lines of QoS
in the VM...
Regards
Ingo Oeser
[1] >1500 possible clients for these servers.
[2] Not counting swaps as file backed. We have a special inode
for the swapper anyway, right?
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag <http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag>
<<<<<<<<<<<< come and join the fun >>>>>>>>>>>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-04 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-23 20:00 VM balancing problems under 2.4.2-ac1 Adam Sampson
2001-02-24 2:22 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-24 10:33 ` Joseph Bueno
2001-02-24 14:37 ` Rik van Riel
2001-02-26 16:33 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-03-03 0:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2001-03-04 17:26 ` Ingo Oeser [this message]
2001-03-05 7:05 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010304182601.D27675@nightmaster.csn.tu-chemnitz.de \
--to=ingo.oeser@informatik.tu-chemnitz.de \
--cc=azz@gnu.org \
--cc=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).