linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J . A . Magallon" <jamagallon@able.es>
To: Ying Chen <yingchenb@hotmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: threads
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2001 01:07:34 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010307010734.C1132@werewolf.able.es> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <F41oVQAiEGKROptzzpY000014a6@hotmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <F41oVQAiEGKROptzzpY000014a6@hotmail.com>; from yingchenb@hotmail.com on Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 00:55:55 +0100


On 03.07 Ying Chen wrote:
> 2. We ran multi-threaded application using Linux pthread library on 2-way 
> SMP and UP intel platforms (with both 2.2 and 2.4 kernels). We see 
> significant increase in context switching when moving from UP to SMP, and 
> high CPU usage with no performance gain in turns of actual work being done 
> when moving to SMP, despite the fact the benchmark we are running is 
> CPU-bound. The kernel profiler indicates that the a lot of kernel CPU ticks 
> went to scheduling and signaling overheads. Has anyone seen something like 
> this before with pthread applications running on SMP platforms? Any 
> suggestions or pointers on this subject?
> 

Too much contention ? How frequently do you create and destroy threads ?
How much frequently do they access shared-writable-data ?
How do you protect them ?

It seems like your system spents more time creating and killing threads
that doing real work.

-- 
J.A. Magallon                                                      $> cd pub
mailto:jamagallon@able.es                                          $> more beer

Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac13 #3 SMP Wed Mar 7 00:09:17 CET 2001 i686


  reply	other threads:[~2001-03-07  0:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-03-06 23:55 Ying Chen
2001-03-07  0:07 ` J . A . Magallon [this message]
2001-03-07  0:40 ` your mail Don Dugger
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-11-10 15:03 threads M.Kiran Babu
2000-11-10 15:39 ` threads Matti Aarnio
2000-11-10 16:05 ` threads Reto Baettig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010307010734.C1132@werewolf.able.es \
    --to=jamagallon@able.es \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yingchenb@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).