From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:52:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:52:17 -0500 Received: from jalon.able.es ([212.97.163.2]:13240 "EHLO jalon.able.es") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:52:00 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:51:30 +0100 From: "J . A . Magallon" To: Krzysztof Halasa Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 Message-ID: <20010313155130.A7393@werewolf.able.es> In-Reply-To: <20010311205408.A5102@wioggin.awwgeez> <20010312115302.A4210@werewolf.able.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT In-Reply-To: ; from khc@intrepid.pm.waw.pl on Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 21:07:51 +0100 X-Mailer: Balsa 1.1.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 03.12 Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > "J . A . Magallon" writes: > > > If you are using pgcc, try getting a real less-buggy compiler, like > egcs1.1.2 > > or gcc-2.95 (even 2.96 willl work). > > ... not always. I've had problems with gcc "2.96" from RH-7.0 > - the compiler was generating obviously incorrect code in some cases > (and it wasn't .c code fault but a compiler problem). Yes, I should have said 'could', instead of 'will'. It works for me, but perhaps I do not hit any of the code that is miscompiled. -- J.A. Magallon $> cd pub mailto:jamagallon@able.es $> more beer Linux werewolf 2.4.2-ac19 #3 SMP Mon Mar 12 23:50:29 CET 2001 i686