From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:23:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:23:26 -0400 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com ([207.175.42.154]:48503 "EHLO lacrosse.corp.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:23:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:23:04 +0100 From: Tim Waugh To: Jakob Kemi Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: your mail Message-ID: <20010409142304.H1136@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.20010402212043.00dadd18@post.utfors.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.20010402212043.00dadd18@post.utfors.se>; from jakob.kemi@post.utfors.se on Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:20:43PM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 09:20:43PM +0200, Jakob Kemi wrote: > Ok, maybe this isn't the right list for this question. In 2.2.x the > parport_probe module extracted the ieee1284 device id correctly and > added to the proc fs. However this doesn't seem to work for me in > 2.4.x It changed place: perhaps that's the problem? /proc/parport/$n is now /proc/sys/dev/parport/$name. > Is there some option I need to enable. As far as I understand the > CONFIG_PARPORT_1284 should be enough?? Yes, it should. Tim. */ --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE60be4ONXnILZ4yVIRAvFSAJ9r9+t8auFaSs7I8100A8R18M7QagCgmN17 QJQPUkHUnnFS8e6tgR3fBd0= =eDcm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --QDd5rp1wjxlDmy9q--