From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:33:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:33:00 -0400 Received: from nef.ens.fr ([129.199.96.32]:50948 "EHLO nef.ens.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:32:51 -0400 Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:32:46 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=C9ric?= Brunet Message-Id: <200104171532.RAA12722@quatramaran.ens.fr> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH(?): linux-2.4.4-pre2: fork should run child first In-Reply-To: <200104171426.JAA76050@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> In-Reply-To: <200104170915.LAA00596@quatramaran.ens.fr> <200104171426.JAA76050@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In ens.mailing-lists.linux-kernel, you wrote: > >I believe it allows the debugger to start the process to be debugged. > Well, the debugger simply needs to do something like pid_t child = fork(); if (child == 0) { ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME,0,0,0); execve(the_debugged_process,args,env); } It is more portable, more traditionnal and works very well. Éric Brunet