From: Ignacio Monge <ignaciomonge@navegalia.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PIO disk writes using 100% system time and performing poorly with VIA vt82c686b on kernels 2.2 & 2.4
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:19:41 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010424191941.5e719746.ignaciomonge@navegalia.com> (raw)
Hi.
I have VIA686a too and a UDMA100 hard disk.
This is my cat /proc/ide/via:
----------VIA BusMastering IDE Configuration----------------
Driver Version: 3.23
South Bridge: VIA vt82c686a
Revision: ISA 0x22 IDE 0x10
Highest DMA rate: UDMA66
BM-DMA base: 0xb800
PCI clock: 33MHz
Master Read Cycle IRDY: 0ws
Master Write Cycle IRDY: 0ws
BM IDE Status Register Read Retry: yes
Max DRDY Pulse Width: No limit
-----------------------Primary IDE-------Secondary IDE------
Read DMA FIFO flush: yes yes
End Sector FIFO flush: no no
Prefetch Buffer: no no
Post Write Buffer: no no
Enabled: yes yes
Simplex only: no no
Cable Type: 40w 40w
-------------------drive0----drive1----drive2----drive3-----
Transfer Mode: DMA UDMA PIO PIO
Address Setup: 30ns 30ns 120ns 120ns
Cmd Active: 90ns 90ns 480ns 480ns
Cmd Recovery: 30ns 30ns 480ns 480ns
Data Active: 90ns 90ns 330ns 330ns
Data Recovery: 30ns 30ns 270ns 270ns
Cycle Time: 120ns 60ns 600ns 600ns
Transfer Rate: 16.5MB/s 33.0MB/s 3.3MB/s 3.3MB/s
As you can see, l use UDMA66 instead UDMA100. I don't know why. Maybe VIA vt82c686a doesn't support it? I have answering in this list a days ago about this problem. but none seems to have a question. Like you, my system goes down when I try to compile something (I have a 394 Mb of RAM and a 1 Ghz processor).
Although, my hdparm output is this:
/dev/hde2:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 0.79 seconds =162.03 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.44 seconds = 26.23 MB/sec
and sometime looks better.
I don't know is this is a problem with the VIA kernel driver or not. But the system doesn't seem to work fine since 2.4.2 or 2.4.1 kernel. I hope (plz!) this problem will be fixed in future.
Luck.
PS: in cat /proc/ide/via I see "Cable Type: 40w 40w"... Is it right? I have a 80w cable, not 40.
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-24 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-24 23:19 Ignacio Monge [this message]
2001-04-24 21:45 ` PIO disk writes using 100% system time and performing poorly with VIA vt82c686b on kernels 2.2 & 2.4 Francois Cami
2001-04-24 22:12 ` Vojtech Pavlik
[not found] <fa.hn82icv.1i1uioa@ifi.uio.no>
2001-04-24 15:37 ` John Weber
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-24 14:00 Thomas Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010424191941.5e719746.ignaciomonge@navegalia.com \
--to=ignaciomonge@navegalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).