From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:06:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:05:50 -0400 Received: from web13703.mail.yahoo.com ([216.136.175.136]:22035 "HELO web13703.mail.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 11:05:40 -0400 Message-ID: <20010516150538.20451.qmail@web13703.mail.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 08:05:38 -0700 (PDT) From: siva prasad To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sorry for the newbie question.. Is it true that the ipc calls like msgget(),shmget()... are not really system calls? Cos in the file "asm/unistd.h" where the system calls are listed as __NR_xxx we dont find the appropriate listing for the ipc calls. What I guessed was that all the ipc calls are clubbed under the 'int ipc()' system call and this is well listed in the "asm/unistd.h" Could some one explain why the ipc is implemented this way rather that implementing them as individual system calls as in UNIX. Or is it the same way in UNIX __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Auctions - buy the things you want at great prices http://auctions.yahoo.com/