From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 16:02:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 16:01:59 -0400 Received: from [136.159.55.21] ([136.159.55.21]:56991 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 16 May 2001 16:01:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 14:01:08 -0600 Message-Id: <200105162001.f4GK18X10128@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven , Alan Cox , Ingo Oeser , Linus Torvalds , Neil Brown , Jeff Garzik , Linux Kernel Mailing List , viro@math.psu.edu Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants In-Reply-To: <3B02D6AB.E381D317@transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <200105152141.f4FLff300686@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <200105161822.f4GIMo509185@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <3B02D6AB.E381D317@transmeta.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin writes: > Richard Gooch wrote: > > Argh! What I wrote in text is what I meant to say. The code didn't > > match. No wonder people seemed to be missing the point. So the line of > > code I actually meant was: > > if (strcmp (buffer + len - 3, "/cd") != 0) { > > This is still a really bad idea. You don't want to tie this kind of > things to the name. Why do you think it's a bad idea? Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca