From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:07:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:07:21 -0400 Received: from cisco7500-mainGW.gts.cz ([194.213.32.131]:6148 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 13:06:57 -0400 Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 10:20:30 +0000 From: Pavel Machek To: Johannes Erdfelt Cc: Linus Torvalds , James Simmons , Alexander Viro , Alan Cox , Neil Brown , Jeff Garzik , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Message-ID: <20010517102029.A44@toy.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20010515145830.Y5599@sventech.com> <20010515154325.Z5599@sventech.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <20010515154325.Z5599@sventech.com>; from johannes@erdfelt.com on Tue, May 15, 2001 at 03:43:26PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > But no, I don't actually like sockets all that much myself. They are hard > > to use from scripts, and many more people are familiar with open/close and > > read/write. > > Agreed. > > It would be nice to use open/close/read/write for control and bulk and > sockets for interrupt and isochronous. What makes interrupt so different? Last time I checked int pipes were very similar to bulk pipes... Do you care about "packet boundaries"? You can somehow emulate with read, too... Pavel -- Philips Velo 1: 1"x4"x8", 300gram, 60, 12MB, 40bogomips, linux, mutt, details at http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/velo/index.html.