From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:36:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:36:05 -0400 Received: from unthought.net ([212.97.129.24]:33712 "HELO mail.unthought.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 20 May 2001 22:35:59 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 04:35:53 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?= To: "Robert M. Love" Cc: Jes Sorensen , John Cowan , esr@thyrsus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [kbuild-devel] Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Message-ID: <20010521043553.C20911@unthought.net> Mail-Followup-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jakob_=D8stergaard?= , "Robert M. Love" , Jes Sorensen , John Cowan , esr@thyrsus.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net In-Reply-To: <20010505192731.A2374@thyrsus.com> <20010513112543.A16121@thyrsus.com> <20010515173316.A8308@thyrsus.com> <3B054500.2090408@reutershealth.com> <990411054.773.0.camel@phantasy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <990411054.773.0.camel@phantasy>; from rml@tech9.net on Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:10:49PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 10:10:49PM -0400, Robert M. Love wrote: > On 21 May 2001 02:29:17 +0200, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > John> Au contraire. It is very reasonable to have both python and > > John> python2 installed. Having two different gcc versions installed > > John> is a big pain in the arse. > > > > It's not unreasonable to have both installed, it's unreasonable to > > require it. > > > > Eric seems to think he can tell every distributor to ship Python2 > > tomorrow. Well it's a fine dream but it's not going to happen; > > I think this is a very important point, and one I agree with. I tend to > let my distribution handle stuff like python. now, I use RedHat's > on-going devel, RawHide. it is not using python2. in fact, since > switching to python2 may break old stuff, I don't expect python2 until > 8.0. that wont be for 9 months. 90% of RedHat's configuration tools, et > al, are written in python1 and they just are not going to change on > someone's whim. 2.6.0 isn't going to happen for at least a year or two. What's the problem ? Want 2.5.X ? Get the tools too. I'm in no position to push people around, but I think the whining about CML2 tool requirements is completely unjustified. If we required that everything worked with GCC 2.7.2 and nmake, where would we be today ? I'm a lot more worried about CML2 itself than about the tools it requires :) > > im not installing python2 from source just so i can run some new config > utility. python2 will be in rawhide when 2.5 development requires it, if I'm not much mistaken. Whether CML2 requires python2 or not, the distributions will change. This is not about Eric pushing something down people's throats. Tools evolve, and new revisions introduce incompatibilities, but distributions still follow the evolution. Nobody ships perl4 today either. -- ................................................................ : jakob@unthought.net : And I see the elder races, : :.........................: putrid forms of man : : Jakob Østergaard : See him rise and claim the earth, : : OZ9ABN : his downfall is at hand. : :.........................:............{Konkhra}...............: