From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:44:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:43:57 -0400 Received: from [213.96.124.18] ([213.96.124.18]:33258 "HELO dardhal") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 6 Jun 2001 13:43:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 19:44:32 +0000 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Luis_Domingo_L=F3pez?= To: Linux Kernel Subject: Re: temperature standard - global config option? Message-ID: <20010606194432.A1858@dardhal.mired.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linux Kernel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, 06 June 2001, at 18:06:56 +0200, Chris Boot wrote: > Hi, > > > Please, don't. > > > > Use kelvins *0.1, and use them consistently everywhere. This is what > > ACPI does, and it is probably right. > > I'm sorry, by I don't feel like adding 273 to every number I get just to > find the temperature of something. What I would do is give configuration > What about keeping times with format similar to "06 June 2001, at 18:06:56 +0200" instead of using miliseconds from 01 Jan 1970 ? ;) If there is a universally-accepted measure for temperatures, we should use it, and let user space applications make the conversions for us. Just my 0.02 (eurocents :) -- José Luis Domingo López Linux Registered User #189436 Debian GNU/Linux Potato (P166 64 MB RAM) jdomingo EN internautas PUNTO org => ¿ Spam ? Atente a las consecuencias jdomingo AT internautas DOT org => Spam at your own risk