From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:32:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:32:38 -0400 Received: from 64-42-29-14.atgi.net ([64.42.29.14]:2565 "HELO mail.clouddancer.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Jun 2001 21:32:25 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: obsolete code must die In-Reply-To: <9g93vf$2mp$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> In-Reply-To: <992481885.7126.0.camel@phantasy> <9g93vf$2mp$1@ns1.clouddancer.com> Reply-To: klink@clouddancer.com Message-Id: <20010614013224.0E3A278599@mail.clouddancer.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 18:32:24 -0700 (PDT) From: klink@clouddancer.com (Colonel) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In list.kernel, you wrote: >i think we are all missing the ball here: i am happy when i see driver >support for a piece of hardware that i have _NEVER_ heard of and at most >_ONE_ person uses it. why? it means more stuff works in linux. we >dont need to defend how many people use hardware X. if you have X, good >for you. if not, you dont care, but at least good for linux as a whole. Good Point! >lets stop fanning the flames and let this (Microsoft-using, as Rik >pointed out) troll die off. Agreed, he made the filter already. But it was good for some laughs, checking a few cobwebs and I really didn't see flames. Plus I got to test my new mailing list archive.