From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:04:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:04:02 -0400 Received: from beppo.feral.com ([192.67.166.79]:24590 "EHLO beppo.feral.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 18:03:49 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 15:03:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: To: Matthew Dharm cc: Alan Cox , Riley Williams , Ion Badulescu , Shawn Starr , Subject: Re: Gigabit Intel NIC? - Intel Gigabit Ethernet Pro/1000T In-Reply-To: <20010614145221.H17427@one-eyed-alien.net> Message-ID: <20010614145802.Q22077-100000@wonky.feral.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Matthew Dharm wrote: > I know, jumping in at this late-stage is bad form... but if we're talking > about the Intel 82543GC Gigabit MAC, why doesn't someone just use the > FreeBSD if_wx.c driver as a starting point? > > It took me a while to find, as they refer to it as the LIVENGOOD instead of > the 82543, but the PCI ProductID values seem to match... > > Matt Let me stir the pot a bit and report that the Intel driver folks (yes, they *do* have them) claim to have a driver that blows the doors off of wx. I told them that with their access to docs and to actual chip engineers that if it *didn't* do so, they really were in sad shape. -matt