From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:16:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:16:47 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:17210 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:16:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:16:34 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Richard Henderson Cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: unregistered changes to the user<->kernel API Message-ID: <20010614201634.C2115@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010614191219.A30567@athlon.random> <20010614191634.B30567@athlon.random> <20010614192122.C30567@athlon.random> <20010614103249.A28852@redhat.com> <20010614194757.B715@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010614194757.B715@athlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:47:57PM +0200 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:47:57PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 10:32:49AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote: > > within glibc, and (2) making these accesses slower since they > > will be considered O_DIRECT after the change. > > and then read/write will return -EINVAL which is life-threatening. > O_DIRECT like rawio via /dev/raw imposes special buffer size and > alignment (size multiple of softblocksize of the fs and softblocksize > alignment, at max I can turn it down to hardblocksize without intensive > changes and guaranteeing zerocopy [modulo bounce buffers on x86 of > course]). > > So in short at least glibc would need to be replaced... in the meantime we solve this issue I released a new o_direct patch and a 2.4.6pre3aa1 with O_DIRECT set like in the patches I sent to Linus at the start of the thread. As soon as we take a definitive decision I will update them. (in the meantime alpha users will at least be allowed again to use O_SYNC with o_direct support applied ;) Andrea