From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:28:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:27:57 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:26173 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Jun 2001 14:27:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 20:27:44 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Alan Cox Cc: Jeff Garzik , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Richard Henderson Subject: Re: unregistered changes to the user<->kernel API Message-ID: <20010614202744.D2115@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <20010614200328.A2115@athlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:11:27PM +0100 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 14, 2001 at 07:11:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > I dont see why Tux should be merged. If we have people achieving the same > performance in user space with the core facilities tux added to the kernel I never had doubt that you could do the same in userspace using the zorocopy functionality (see the old threads with Jeff V. Merkey and netware when I was saying you don't need it in kernel) so in theory I totally agree since the first place... > like the better irq/sendfile stuff why bother merging tux ? ... but in practice x15 is nor open source nor free software and I'd prefer to have an open choice. I wouldn't even think to merge tux if zope, apache, thttpd would run as fast as tux of course. Andrea