From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Subject: Re: [Final call for testers][PATCH] superblock handling changes (2.4.6-pre3)
Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2001 17:49:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010615174946.D9522@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010615171632.C9522@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106151221190.8909-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106151221190.8909-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>; from viro@math.psu.edu on Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:34:41PM -0400
On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 12:34:41PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote:
> Aside of the missing ->s_count++ - no arguments.
My mistake.
> > > + list_add (&s->s_list, super_blocks.prev);
> >
> > I'd use list_add_tail(&s->s_list, super_blocks);
>
> Umm... Why? I've no problems with either variant, but I really see no
> clear win (or loss) in list_add_tail here. If there is some code that
> relies on the order in that list it's badly broken - remember, we used
> to reuse unmounted superblocks, so order might be almost arbitrary.
It does exactly the same thing -- inserting at the end of the list --
just slightly more obvious what its doing.
--
Revolutions do not require corporate support.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-15 16:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-12 4:29 [CFT][PATCH] superblock handling changes Alexander Viro
2001-06-12 3:22 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2001-06-12 5:17 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-12 6:38 ` George Bonser
2001-06-13 4:50 ` [CFT][PATCH] superblock handling changes (2.4.6-pre3) Alexander Viro
2001-06-15 5:10 ` [Final call for testers][PATCH] " Alexander Viro
2001-06-15 16:16 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-06-15 16:34 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-15 16:41 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-15 16:49 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2001-06-15 19:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-06-15 19:18 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-15 17:02 ` Jonathan Lundell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010615174946.D9522@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk \
--to=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).