From: Olaf Hering <olh@suse.de>
To: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac14
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 22:47:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010617224719.D20397@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oupzob9q84y.fsf@pigdrop.muc.suse.de> <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106160322510.10605-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0106160322510.10605-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>; from viro@math.psu.edu on Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 03:37:15AM -0400
On Sat, Jun 16, Alexander Viro wrote:
>
>
> On 16 Jun 2001, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> > > Alan Cox writes:
> > > > Because right now I dont consider the 2.4.6 page cache ext2 stuff safe
> > > > enough to merge. I'm letting someone else be the sucide squad.. so far it
> > > > looks like it is indeed fine but I want to wait and see more yet
> > >
> > > If it means anything it has already withstanded a few
> > > cerebus-->fsck_check-->cerebus rounds on machines here
> > > in my lab.
> >
> > ... it also seems to make ppc not boot anymore.
>
> OK, after looking at the bug report things smell very strange:
>
> * kernel had barfed on lookup for /dev/console.
> * kernel had found /dev - right inode number, etc.
> * read_cache_page(inode->i_mapping, n, ext2_readpage) on it
> gave all-zeroes for each page within first 32Kb (size of /dev on box in
> question).
> * filesystem is not corrupted.
> * all that stuff had happened with cold caches.
> * kernel was 2.4.6-pre3 + some unspecified modifications.
>
> Very odd. Could somebody try vanilla 2.4.6-pre1 on a PPC box? I _really_
> doubt that it might be an architecture-specific problem in directory
> code - it would simply fail the lookup for /dev in that case.
>
> I'll try to find a PPC nearby, but it may be tricky on weekend. So if
> somebody wants to help... Notice that problem was on read-only mount,
> so it can be tested without risking fs corruption - just try to boot
> with init=/bin/sh and do ls -lR, etc.
Al,
the pre2 didnt boot on the POWER3 SMP box. pre3 does (runs in 32bit
mode).
It could be a compiler bug because we have some trouble right now with
our toolchain on ppc32.
Right now it runs pre3 fine with a binary from the same compiler etc.
I have seen this only on that box.
Is it possible that a ppc64 writes some bogus values to the disk? I had
a ppc64 binary running but I wasnt too excited about it because it
misses some essential stuff like autofs. So I booted the 2.4.2 ppc32
kernel again with no trouble for a while..
Gruss Olaf
--
$ man clone
BUGS
Main feature not yet implemented...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-17 20:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200106162255.SAA02119@olimpo.networx.com.br.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <E15B0vv-000780-00@the-village.bc.nu.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
[not found] ` <15146.33742.299279.102372@pizda.ninka.net.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2001-06-16 5:57 ` Linux 2.4.5-ac14 Andi Kleen
2001-06-16 6:15 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-16 7:37 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-16 8:20 ` Marc ZYNGIER
2001-06-16 8:36 ` Alexander Viro
2001-06-17 20:47 ` Olaf Hering [this message]
2001-06-16 16:33 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-16 19:53 ` pci_disable_device() vs. arch Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-16 20:06 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 20:32 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-16 20:45 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 21:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-16 21:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 23:23 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-15 2:33 Linux 2.4.5-ac14 Dieter Nützel
2001-06-15 2:30 ` John Cavan
2001-06-15 3:32 ` Dieter Nützel
2001-06-15 4:55 ` Dieter Nützel
[not found] ` <200106150442.AAA22505@spqr.damncats.org>
2001-06-15 11:24 ` John Cavan
2001-06-15 10:01 ` Christoph Rohland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-06-14 22:44 Alan Cox
2001-06-15 21:05 ` Thiago Vinhas de Moraes
2001-06-15 21:15 ` Alan Cox
2001-06-15 21:37 ` Andreas Dilger
2001-06-16 20:56 ` Thiago Vinhas de Moraes
2001-06-16 21:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2001-06-15 21:53 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010617224719.D20397@suse.de \
--to=olh@suse.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).