From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S265072AbRFURsW>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:48:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S265074AbRFURsM>; Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:48:12 -0400
Received: from [196.38.105.82] ([196.38.105.82]:25867 "EHLO www.webtrac.co.za")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S265072AbRFURsE>;
	Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:48:04 -0400
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 19:47:48 +0200
From: Craig Schlenter <craig@webtelecoms.co.za>
To: Alan Cox <laughing@shared-source.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@transmeta.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.5-ac17
Message-ID: <20010621194748.C20240@webtelecoms.co.za>
In-Reply-To: <20010621173855.A6444@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre3us
In-Reply-To: <20010621173855.A6444@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 05:38:56PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> [snip]
> 2.4.5-ac17
[snip]

Hi Alan

Sorry to bug you but could you tell us what's up with the synchronisation
between your tree and Linus' please? I haven't seen any ac stuff being
spooled into Linus' tree for a while and the trees seem to be drifting
further apart ... it would be nice if there wasn't much difference
other than the device name and the page cache VFS stuff. I know you're
both hectically busy but it would be nice to know that the plan is not
to let things drift too far apart.

It's getting tricky to decide which tree to dabble with!

Thank you!

--Craig