linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Blesson Paul <blessonpaul@usa.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Re: Process creating]
Date: 27 Jun 2001 00:35:13 MDT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010627063513.18205.qmail@nw171.netaddress.usa.net> (raw)

Hi Android
                        IPC is my last resort. The reason is that, my present
project is to convert a present software to run in beowlf. I am using Mosix
which enables me to parralize the software through forking. The present
software is highly data oriented and highly  complicated. If all the processes
manipulates the data in the same memory area, I need not look into IPC.
Moreover there is less need for synchronisation since the data are readonly.
The memory mapping in  different systems are done by Mosix. It somehow enables
me to use all the memory in different systems as if they are of single one    
      
                             by
                                   Blesson
 
Android <android@abac.com> wrote:

>1  If I point  to a address 0x434343 in P1 and  P2, will it point to the
>same memory area.
>2  If not, I need two processes to use same process area, how to do that
>3  Will linux kernel support threading
>                             Actually I first thought about shared memory.
But
>for my application, I need huge memory area upto 50MB or more. So 50MB of
>shared memory is no good. So I looking for any other alternatives
>
>                        by
>                                   Blesson

1: P1 and P2 have different physical areas of memory. This is how 
protection works.

2: Why do they need to share the same memory? You can have your second
process
communicate with your first process through IPC.

3: Linux supports threading if you include the thread library, and use the 
appropriate
threading process calls.

Another thing you can do is have a common space on the hard drive. It's not 
as fast as RAM,
but it's one solution.

                                                        -- Ted




             reply	other threads:[~2001-06-27  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-27  6:35 Blesson Paul [this message]
2001-06-30 10:32 ` [Re: Process creating] Jan Hudec

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20010627063513.18205.qmail@nw171.netaddress.usa.net \
    --to=blessonpaul@usa.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).