From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266054AbRF1RcF>; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:32:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266060AbRF1Rb4>; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:31:56 -0400
Received: from vitelus.com ([64.81.36.147]:7184 "EHLO vitelus.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266054AbRF1Rbo>;
	Thu, 28 Jun 2001 13:31:44 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 10:30:38 -0700
From: Aaron Lehmann <aaronl@vitelus.com>
To: chuckw@altaserv.net
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        Vipin Malik <vipin.malik@daniel.com>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, jffs-dev@axis.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch.
Message-ID: <20010628103038.B27775@vitelus.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0106281028170.10308-100000@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.18i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 10:29:11AM -0700, chuckw@altaserv.net wrote:
> Taking that one step further, isn't it a developer's right to "toot their
> own horn" in their code?

Right. In the code. Not in the Linux boot diagnostic information.