From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:57:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:57:40 -0400 Received: from khan.acc.umu.se ([130.239.18.139]:22918 "EHLO khan.acc.umu.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 28 Jun 2001 06:57:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 12:57:26 +0200 From: David Weinehall To: Bjorn Wesen Cc: lar@cs.york.ac.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Cosmetic JFFS patch. Message-ID: <20010628125726.F4301@khan.acc.umu.se> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from bjorn@sparta.lu.se on Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:19:37AM +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 28, 2001 at 11:19:37AM +0200, Bjorn Wesen wrote: > On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Laramie Leavitt wrote: > > > dmesg buffer space is rather limited and IMHO there isn't space to > > > waste on credit-giving in boot logs. > > > > Here here. You don't see annoying log-eating copyright messages > > printed out in the Windows boot. Just imagine: > > There's a difference; someone paid for that Windows code and you paid to > get windows and don't care about who did what. But when someone puts down > a lot of work to contributes something for free which others find useful > and actually use, don't you think it might be prudent to let them at least > write who contributed it, if a line is going to be printed anyway to say > device that or that has been registred ? > > I know it sounds a bit like an "advertisment space" but it's always been > so; people have been releasing code for free since noone knows how long > and often one major factor has been that their peers will go "wow did > you do that". Otherwise why would anyone ever write their name in an About > box when they release a freeware program. And dmesg is the Linux kernels > About box (someone might argue that the code is the about box but > unfortunately most people dont read the headers in every .c file they > use). > > See the old BSD license - distribution-wise it's more free than the GPL > but you still had to give credit where credit is due when getting a free > lunch from someone elses work (I think this requirement was dropped in the > current BSD license) > > The risk is that some people might take it quite personally to get their > names removed and might not be as interested to see their code in the > kernel in the future. Of course as long as it's GPL nothing would stop it > anyway, but I still think it's a good idea to give credit for others hard > work. tao@tictac$ grep "^N:" CREDITS | sed -e "s/N: //" | wc 392 863 5916 Add a little for (c) xxxx and other stuff, and you're getting close to the size of the dmesg-buffer. Is it worth it? Now, I can't claim to be 100% innocent; my name appears in the procinfo for at least one MCA-driver. This will be remedied in due time, I can assure you. I hope others follow my example. /David Weinehall _ _ // David Weinehall /> Northern lights wander \\ // Project MCA Linux hacker // Dance across the winter sky // \> http://www.acc.umu.se/~tao/