From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266168AbRF2UMT>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:12:19 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266171AbRF2UMJ>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:12:09 -0400
Received: from [63.140.126.166] ([63.140.126.166]:34308 "EHLO helium.inexs.com")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S266168AbRF2ULv>;
	Fri, 29 Jun 2001 16:11:51 -0400
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:11:51 -0500
From: Chuck Campbell <campbell@neosoft.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: campbell@neosoft.com
Subject: motherboard/chipset confusion
Message-ID: <20010629151151.A27538@helium.inexs.com>
Reply-To: campbell@neosoft.com
Mail-Followup-To: Chuck Campbell <campbell@neosoft.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

I've been lurking lkml for a number of years, I follow most of what goes 
on here, and I don't pipe up often, but I'm trying to id a new system, and
I'm confused about all of the via chipset problems/issues talked about here
recently.

Simply put, what chipset(s) should I consider for purchase, or if the 
converse subset is smaller, what should I avoid?

I've searched and found nothing about the VIA VT8633 chipset, but a lot
about problematic VIA chipsets, so I'm wary.  Any feed back on this chipset
or, specifically the ASUS CUV266 motherboard?

thanks,
-chuck

-- 
ACCEL Services, Inc.| Specialists in Gravity, Magnetics |  1(713)993-0671 ph.
1980 Post Oak Blvd. |   and Integrated Interpretation   |  1(713)960-1157 fax
    Suite 2050      |                                   |
 Houston, TX, 77056 |          Chuck Campbell           | campbell@neosoft.com
                    |  President & Senior Geoscientist  |

     "Integration means more than having all the maps at the same scale!"