From: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
alan@redhat.com, torvalds@transmeta.com
Cc: "Oleg I. Vdovikin" <vdovikin@jscc.ru>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] Re: alpha - generic_init_pit - why using RTC for calibration?
Date: Wed, 4 Jul 2001 11:45:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010704114530.A1030@twiddle.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <022901c10095$f4fca650$4d28d0c3@jscc.ru> <20010629211931.A582@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20010629211931.A582@jurassic.park.msu.ru>; from ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru on Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:19:31PM +0400
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 09:19:31PM +0400, Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> Good idea. The patch below works reliably on my sx164.
Reasonable. Here I've cleaned up time_init a tad as well.
r~
--- arch/alpha/kernel/time.c.orig Fri Jun 29 11:24:03 2001
+++ arch/alpha/kernel/time.c Fri Jun 29 11:35:52 2001
@@ -169,6 +169,77 @@ common_init_rtc(void)
init_rtc_irq();
}
+/*
+ * Calibrate CPU clock using legacy 8254 timer/counter. Stolen from
+ * arch/i386/time.c.
+ */
+
+#define CALIBRATE_LATCH (52 * LATCH)
+#define CALIBRATE_TIME (52 * 1000020 / HZ)
+
+static unsigned long __init
+calibrate_cc_with_pic(void)
+{
+ int cc;
+ unsigned long count = 0;
+
+ /* Set the Gate high, disable speaker */
+ outb((inb(0x61) & ~0x02) | 0x01, 0x61);
+
+ /*
+ * Now let's take care of CTC channel 2
+ *
+ * Set the Gate high, program CTC channel 2 for mode 0,
+ * (interrupt on terminal count mode), binary count,
+ * load 5 * LATCH count, (LSB and MSB) to begin countdown.
+ */
+ outb(0xb0, 0x43); /* binary, mode 0, LSB/MSB, Ch 2 */
+ outb(CALIBRATE_LATCH & 0xff, 0x42); /* LSB of count */
+ outb(CALIBRATE_LATCH >> 8, 0x42); /* MSB of count */
+
+ cc = rpcc();
+ do {
+ count++;
+ } while ((inb(0x61) & 0x20) == 0);
+ cc = rpcc() - cc;
+
+ /* Error: ECTCNEVERSET */
+ if (count <= 1)
+ goto bad_ctc;
+
+ /* Error: ECPUTOOFAST */
+ if (count >> 32)
+ goto bad_ctc;
+
+ /* Error: ECPUTOOSLOW */
+ if (cc <= CALIBRATE_TIME)
+ goto bad_ctc;
+
+ return ((long)cc * 1000000) / CALIBRATE_TIME;
+
+ /*
+ * The CTC wasn't reliable: we got a hit on the very first read,
+ * or the CPU was so fast/slow that the quotient wouldn't fit in
+ * 32 bits..
+ */
+ bad_ctc:
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* The Linux interpretation of the CMOS clock register contents:
+ When the Update-In-Progress (UIP) flag goes from 1 to 0, the
+ RTC registers show the second which has precisely just started.
+ Let's hope other operating systems interpret the RTC the same way. */
+
+static unsigned long __init
+rpcc_after_update_in_progress(void)
+{
+ do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
+ do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
+
+ return rpcc();
+}
+
void __init
time_init(void)
{
@@ -176,24 +247,15 @@ time_init(void)
unsigned long cycle_freq, one_percent;
long diff;
- /*
- * The Linux interpretation of the CMOS clock register contents:
- * When the Update-In-Progress (UIP) flag goes from 1 to 0, the
- * RTC registers show the second which has precisely just started.
- * Let's hope other operating systems interpret the RTC the same way.
- */
- do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
- do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
+ /* Calibrate CPU clock -- attempt #1. */
+ if (!est_cycle_freq)
+ est_cycle_freq = calibrate_cc_with_pic();
- /* Read cycle counter exactly on falling edge of update flag */
- cc1 = rpcc();
+ cc1 = rpcc_after_update_in_progress();
+ /* Calibrate CPU clock -- attempt #2. */
if (!est_cycle_freq) {
- /* Sometimes the hwrpb->cycle_freq value is bogus.
- Go another round to check up on it and see. */
- do { } while (!(CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP));
- do { } while (CMOS_READ(RTC_FREQ_SELECT) & RTC_UIP);
- cc2 = rpcc();
+ cc2 = rpcc_after_update_in_progress();
est_cycle_freq = cc2 - cc1;
cc1 = cc2;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-04 18:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-29 12:20 alpha - generic_init_pit - why using RTC for calibration? Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-06-29 17:19 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2001-07-02 9:52 ` Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-07-03 13:06 ` Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-07-04 18:45 ` Richard Henderson [this message]
2001-07-05 7:14 ` [patch] " Oleg I. Vdovikin
[not found] ` <3B441618.638A3FC@mandrakesoft.com>
2001-07-05 8:36 ` Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-07-05 8:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-07-06 8:45 ` Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-07-05 9:43 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2001-07-06 9:03 ` Oleg I. Vdovikin
2001-07-06 12:00 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010704114530.A1030@twiddle.net \
--to=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=alan@redhat.com \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=vdovikin@jscc.ru \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).