From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:27:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:27:20 -0400 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:16134 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 23 Jul 2001 18:27:09 -0400 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:27:42 +0200 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Rob Landley Cc: Richard Gooch , linux-kernel Subject: Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7 Message-ID: <20010724002742.J16919@athlon.random> In-Reply-To: <200107232150.f6NLosh13126@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <20010724000933.I16919@athlon.random> <01072309203206.00996@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <01072309203206.00996@localhost.localdomain>; from landley@webofficenow.com on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:20:32AM -0400 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:20:32AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote: > On Monday 23 July 2001 18:09, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > > > GCC will obviously _never_ introduce a BUG(), I never said that, the > > above example is only meant to show what GCC is _allowed_ to do and what > > we have to do to write correct C code. > > "Correct" C code as in portable C code? Standards compliant so it's portable correct C code _mainly_ for gcc which is very aggressive. Andrea