From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S268560AbRG3V7h>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:59:37 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S268489AbRG3V71>; Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:59:27 -0400
Received: from ns.caldera.de ([212.34.180.1]:34990 "EHLO ns.caldera.de")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S268560AbRG3V7P>;
	Mon, 30 Jul 2001 17:59:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2001 23:58:59 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Cc: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: ReiserFS / 2.4.6 / Data Corruption
Message-ID: <20010730235859.A24763@caldera.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@caldera.de>,
	Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>, Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vitaly Fertman <vitaly@namesys.com>
In-Reply-To: <200107281645.f6SGjA620666@ns.caldera.de> <3B653211.FD28320@namesys.com> <20010730210644.A5488@caldera.de> <3B65C3D4.FF8EB12D@namesys.com> <20010730224930.A18311@caldera.de> <3B65CC07.24E3EF4C@namesys.com> <20010730232956.A20969@caldera.de> <3 <3B65D613.E8A0F4BF@namesys.com> <20010731095721.E6318@weta.f00f.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010731095721.E6318@weta.f00f.org>; from cw@f00f.org on Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:57:21AM +1200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing

On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:57:21AM +1200, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:48:03AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> 
>     I also don't consider any 2.4 prior to 2.4.4 to be stable, and I
>     don't consider 2.4.4 to be especially stable but it is usable.
> 
>     Shipping 2.4.2 is something you and RedHat did for understandable
>     marketing reasons.  SuSE waited for 2.4.4.
> 
> This is a myth.
> 
> As has been explained --- RedHat does _NOT_ ship a stock
> kernel.  Redhat 2.4.2 is not the same as stock/linux 2.4.2 so you are
> comparing apples with oranges.

The same is true for Caldera, btw.

	Christoph

-- 
Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade.