From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:11:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:11:14 -0400 Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:38154 "HELO krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 3 Aug 2001 14:11:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2001 20:11:12 +0200 From: Matthias Andree To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" Cc: Daniel Phillips , Jan Harkes , Matthias Andree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: ext3-2.4-0.9.4 Message-ID: <20010803201112.D31468@emma1.emma.line.org> Mail-Followup-To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Daniel Phillips , Jan Harkes , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3B5FC7FB.D5AF0932@zip.com.au> <01080316082001.01827@starship> <20010803111803.B25450@cs.cmu.edu> <01080317471707.01827@starship> <20010803165036.C12470@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010803165036.C12470@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.19i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 03 Aug 2001, Stephen Tweedie wrote: > > We don't need all the paths, and not any specific path, just a path. > > Exactly, because fsync makes absolutely no gaurantees about the > namespace. So a lost+found path is quite sufficient. MTA authors don't share this. lost+found is "invisible" for the application that created the file. I have yet to meet a distribution which scans lost+found at boot time and syslogs found files or sends root a mail. So, effectively, lost+found will NOT be sufficient. Discarding file names at will is not a good thing. -- Matthias Andree