From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:54:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:54:27 -0400 Received: from weta.f00f.org ([203.167.249.89]:61584 "EHLO weta.f00f.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 09:54:14 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 01:55:09 +1200 From: Chris Wedgwood To: Alan Cox Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc//maps getting _VERY_ long Message-ID: <20010807015509.A24099@weta.f00f.org> In-Reply-To: <20010807002320.A23937@weta.f00f.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i X-No-Archive: Yes Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 06, 2001 at 02:17:32PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: mmap nothing over a large space shouldn't the rlimit be in the mmap? (or are sparse mappings not supposed to count towards the rlimit?) --cw